Home Blog Page 583

Guess It Matters S3E6 – Studio Sessions

Video version of the Podcast

Last week we discussed how to approach your set list. It must have been a great topic because our subscribers grew. We need everyone to make sure and subscribe and share our YouTube channel. Once we get to 100 subscribers we get our own personalized YouTube address. We also want to make it interesting with a giveaway. We aren’t sure yet what the giveaway will be maybe you can message us and let us know what types of things you would like to win. We’d also like to hear from you on our Facebook page or email with some topics you’d like to hear us cover on the podcast.

Over the years we have worked with some amazing producers. Sometimes when you are getting to know your producers you find out that they have a professional distance with new recording artists. You really want your producer to be part of the band “so to speak”. You want the creative flow to be open and honest. Sometimes this professional distance stems from artists having a greater expectation about themselves than what the reality really is. If you have ever walked into a studio to record and if feels like the producer isn’t getting you the quality you expected, or the experience you expected you’ll find one of the problems in this equation in one of the rooms located in every studio. The bathroom – where you’ll find a mirror. Now don’t get us wrong the issue is fixable but you can’t expect it to be fixed at 150 an hour trying to cut your songs. There is a lot you need to learn before walking into a studio. On this episode we are going to provide a few helpful hints that might help make your next recording session a bit more productive and successful.

If you are not under a recording contract that the record company is paying for chances are you are paying for your record. That is 99% of how most albums are done now. One of the biggest mistakes a person or group makes going into the studio is showing up not fully prepared. Now, this one is very easy to overlook because one of the things I learned early when first doing studio work is you don’t know what you don’t know. If you spend 10 hours a day 7 days a week rehearsing your material and you are learning your parts wrong – that’s one habit that will be the hardest to break once you step behind the studio mic. Another way people lack preparedness is that they are used to singing with live monitors and not headphones. This will mess up your pitch if you are not used to what you are hearing. If you are an artists that doesn’t like to hear yourself on a recording – then you might want to re-think whether a studio recording is the best choice for you. Normally, what is live and the techniques of studio recording have just enough differences to throw you off while you are working on getting the best out of your recording. The best practice is to record yourself with your phone or digital audio workstation through your computer and see what it sounds like on less than studio quality gear. Then, you work on the areas that stand out the most and once you get into the studio – that part won’t give you as many problems. 

Now, there are some things that you can practice on that will help you not only in the studio but live. For solo vocalist, the biggest obstacle is breathing. A lot of vocalist don’t know how to breathe through their phrasings. Breathing is a very important part to your singing. Pronouncing your words correctly and in pitch is another obstacle. If you notice that vowels sounds at the end of words are causing you pitch problems then that is a great place to concentrate. You should learn to hold your E and AH sounds and you should work on how to cut those off when necessary on endings.

For vocal groups, phrasing seems to be a huge problem in the studio. We know that with modern equipment it tends to make us lazy but even modern computers can’t fix 4 different humans pronouncing their S’s. One thing we work on is allowing the lead vocalist to say the S at the end of a word and everyone else not. For example – the lead vocalist might sing the word “place” but everyone else in the group would say – play but end with the lead vocalist. That will make your phrasing so much better in the studio and live. It is so subtle that the audience doesn’t catch it – but when you have 4 people holding their S’s differently it stands out. What is overwhelming is that is ONE vocal sound and there are many others. We work a lot on words that have T’s in them. If you can get them together then that is fantastic. The object is that you are creating an instrumentation with your voice that sounds consistent.

Working with producers over the years we have also heard them complain about people being original. Originality is your greatest asset as an artist. Originality sets you a part from being a parody or imitation of an original. Now, a lot of Elvis impersonators have made a mint doing that type of entertaining but that’s it  – they can never explore any other options than the life of Elvis. If you sing or play music to express your belief and your love for music – be original. It is okay to phrase your words like your heroes or try to mimic their vocal impressions but that’s should only be .05% of it. The other 99.95% should all you and who God made you to be. We hope this discussion helps and if you have any questions about any of our podcasts – feel free to drop us a line on facebook or by email (shayandmichi@gmail.com). Leave us a comment on the youtube video and we’ll answer it. Thanks for stopping by and don’t forget to like and subscribe to our channel! Also, if you know someone working in the studio – send them a link to our video or podcast. We would like to give a shout-out to some of our friends that are producers! Tommy Swindle, Jonathan Goodwin, Scott Godsey, Dale Maxwell, Darren Morton, Anthony Bollinger, David Hollaway and the late and very dear friend of ours Dave Wilcox. Thank you for teaching us and helping all the singers be their best.

If it matters to you – it Matters to us! 

Voters could remove Jim Crow law designed to thwart African American-backed candidates

Voters will have the opportunity in November to remove a Jim Crow-era provision from the state Constitution that makes Mississippi the only state in the nation where a candidate for statewide office can win a majority of the popular vote and not be elected.

The Mississippi Constitution, adopted in 1890, requires the winning candidate for governor and for other statewide offices to obtain both a majority of the popular vote and win the most votes in a majority of the 122 House districts. If no candidate obtains both of those requirements, the Mississippi House of Representatives gets to choose the winner of the top two vote-getters.

But a resolution passed this month by both chambers of the Mississippi Legislature would remove that requirement. This week’s legislative action means that Mississippi voters will decide in November whether to remove that provision from the Constitution.

The provision was placed in the Constitution in 1890, according to the written account of that time, to ensure Black Mississippians, then a majority in the state, were not elected to statewide office. The state House districts were configured in a manner to ensure white Mississippians would have a majority in that chamber.

The Legislature acted in response to a federal lawsuit challenging whether the electoral provisions violated principles of the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit was filed last year in the midst of the gubernatorial race between Democratic Attorney General Jim Hood and Republican Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves.

The lawsuit claimed that under the gerrymandered House districts, Hood would have had to win as much as 55 percent of the popular vote to win the majority of the House districts. In effect, the plaintiffs argued, the provision dilutes the strength of African American voters, who are more prone to vote for the Democratic candidate in Mississippi.

U.S. Judge Daniel Jordan of the Southern District of Mississippi did not rule on the lawsuit but expressed “grave concerns” and indicated he might rule at a later date if the election was impacted by the provision or if the Legislature did not act to remove the provision. Jordan met with legislative leaders about the issue before the 2020 session began. With Reeves garnering 52 percent of the vote and winning the majority of the House districts, the provision throwing the election into the House was not a factor.

The lawsuit was filed by the National Redistricting Foundation and the Mississippi Center for Justice on behalf of African American voters in the state. In a press release, the Mississippi Center for Justice pointed out that the Legislature’s final passage of the resolution on Monday comes one day after lawmakers addressed another 1890s-era issue: the removal of the state flag that has the Confederate battle emblem as part of its design.

“In the wake of the historic removal of the Confederate emblem from our state’s flag, we are pleased the Legislature is taking this additional step to remove this racist relic of the post-Reconstruction era from Mississippi law,” said Vangela M. Wade, president of the Mississippi Center for Justice. “In addition to joining in the lawsuit that led to this development, we are moving forward with our challenge to Mississippi’s felon disfranchisement law, which is another discriminatory provision of the 1890 Constitution. We want to take advantage of this important moment in American race relations to advance the cause of justice in our home state of Mississippi.”

If approved by voters in November, the provision will be removed, but Mississippi will still be in a minority of states. Under the resolution approved by the Legislature and pending the approval of the voters, Mississippi would become one of only three states in the nation to require a runoff between the top two vote-getters if no candidate achieves a majority of the votes. Georgia and Louisiana require runoffs. Vermont’s statewide elections are thrown to its legislature to decide if no candidate obtains a majority.

Sen. Hob Bryan, D-Amory, was one of two senators to vote against the resolution. He supported removing the provision throwing elections into the House but opposed placing in the Constitution the runoff. He said the runoff could be placed in general law.

It takes more votes (two-thirds of both chambers and a vote of the people) to change constitutional provisions than it does general law, which requires only a majority to change.

“We are tying the hands of future legislatures,” said Bryan, who said a future legislature might want to do ranked voting. Ranked voting gives extra points to candidates who finish No. 2 in a multiple candidate field in order to select a winner.

Senate Constitution Chair Chris Johnson, R-Hattiesburg, said, “Sen. Bryan has made valid points,” but indicated at this late date in the session senators should pass the language before them creating the runoff.

The only instances where the electoral provision was a factor were in three consecutive elections in the 1990s.

Editor’s note: Vangela M. Wade is a member of Mississippi Today’s board of directors.

The post Voters could remove Jim Crow law designed to thwart African American-backed candidates appeared first on Mississippi Today.

Confederate battle flag comes down: Myrlie Evers weeps. ‘Medgar’s wings must be clapping.’

Kayleigh Skinner/Mississippi Today

Myrlie Evers and Gov. William Winter head to the opening ceremonies for the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum and the Museum of Mississippi History in December, 2017.

Myrlie Evers began to weep when she heard the Mississippi Legislature voted to remove the Confederate battle emblem from the state flag.

“I can’t believe it. I am so emotional,” the widow of slain civil rights leader Medgar Evers said. “Medgar’s wings must be clapping.”

On Sunday, the Mississippi House and Senate voted to replace the current state flag, a day after they voted to suspend the rules in order to bring up the new legislation.

If Gov. Tate Reeves signs the bill as expected, Mississippi would cease being the remaining state in the nation with the Confederate battle flag as a part of its state flag.

Under the legislation, a nine-person commission would be appointed to adopt a new design for the state flag. That design must include the phrase, “In God We Trust,” but it can’t include the Confederate battle emblem.

If voters in November reject the new design, the commission would present a different option to the Legislature in 2021.

A recent poll found that 55% of Mississippians wanted to change the current flag. That number jumped to 72% when the flag incorporated the motto, “In God We Trust.”

Both House Speaker Philip Gunn and Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann championed passage of the bill in the Republican-controlled Legislature.

State Sen. Robert Johnson, D-Natchez, said the passage of the bill has taught the state a lesson. “We’re white. We’re black,” he said. “We’re from the Delta. We’re from the hills. We’re from the coast. We are one Mississippi moving forward.”

State Sen. Briggs Hopson, R-Vicksburg, acknowledged that the Legislature has “punted this ball away in the past … Right now, in this great state in which we live, on this day, we have an opportunity to push this ball across the goal line.”

Myrlie Evers praised the courage of lawmakers. “I never thought this would happen,” she said. “For the people who hold the palm of Mississippi in their hands, for their wisdom and their strength, for them to vote the way they did is all but unbelievable to me, but I am ever so thankful for that vote.”

Mississippi has flown the current state flag since 1894 — four years after the state adopted a new constitution aimed at reasserting white supremacy and disenfranchising African Americans.

Other Southern states followed Mississippi’s lead, and soon African Americans across the South were barred from voting.

Myrlie Evers was born in 1933 in Vicksburg, the last major Confederate stronghold along the Mississippi River before Confederate soldiers surrendered to Union forces on July 4, 1863.

Growing up there, the Mississippi flag symbolized “slavery and second-class citizenship for those whose color was not white,” she said.

She is nearing 90 years of age, she said, “and I have carried the burden of my skin to what it represented to Caucasians and remember what my forefathers fought for — education and land ownership.”

Her late husband, Medgar, “gave his life for his country,” she said. “He fought in Europe as a second-class soldier, fighting for a country that did not appreciate him. His life was taken June 12, 1963, because of those same freedoms.”

She worries that the hard work of those in the civil rights movement has been forgotten.

“We’re moving into more turbulent times because of the leadership in this country,” she said.

After watching the news, she said she sometimes finds herself in anger and despair.

“I feel my heart being ripped in shreds,” she said. “I hurt that deeply for what’s going on in America today.”

The deaths of George Floyd and other African Americans captured on video and shown on television have resurrected nightmares of the night when her husband was shot in the back in their driveway outside their Jackson, Mississippi, home.

When she heard the gunshot, she ran outside, saw her husband in a pool of blood and screamed. He died an hour later at the hospital.

“America is at a crossroads,” she said, just as it was six decades ago during the civil rights movement.

“I don’t have much time left, but I have children and I have grandchildren,” she said. “What kind of future will they have here, what kind of life will they have here in the land of their birth, the land that their grandfather fought in Europe to protect, America the Beautiful? But America is no longer beautiful.”

She continues to pray for God’s help for the nation, she said. “I’m frightened, and I just hope people of goodwill will come together and vote for what they know is right and what is just and what is good for all of us, regardless of race, creed or color.”

She regards hatred as poison. “It poisons us as individuals,” she said. “I don’t want that poison flowing through my veins anymore.”

What Mississippi has done should inspire the nation, she said. “If Mississippi can make a move like this, I hope the rest of America can look at themselves and their states and see their signs of prejudice, hate and racism and perhaps be brave enough to remove them.”

MCIR’s James Finn contributed to this report.

Jerry Mitchell is an investigative reporter for the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization that is exposing wrongdoing, educating and empowering Mississippians, and raising up the next generation of investigative reporters. Sign up for MCIR’s newsletters here.

Email him at Jerry.Mitchell.MCIR@gmail.com and follow him on FacebookTwitter or Instagram.

The post Confederate battle flag comes down: Myrlie Evers weeps. ‘Medgar’s wings must be clapping.’ appeared first on Mississippi Today.

For not the first time, sports has helped Mississippians see their way to change

Rogelio V. Solis / Associated Press

Mississippi State women’s basketball coach, Nikki McCray-Penson, joins other athletic staffs from the state’s public universities calling for a change in the Mississippi state flag, during a joint news conference at the Capitol in Jackson, Miss., Thursday, June 25,2020.

Sports have never been only a game in Mississippi. No, sports are woven deeply into our cultural fabric, a major part of who we are and what we are about. Always have been.

We take our games seriously. The games our athletes play matter greatly to us. Indeed, the argument has been made, time and again, that the games often matter too much.

But today – especially today – we can save that argument for another time and place. Because weirdly, in this time when the pandemic has placed our sports world on pause, sports have led the way to dramatic change in Mississippi.

Rick Cleveland

Lawmakers Sunday voted to remove the Mississippi state flag more than 126 years after it was adopted. No longer will the state flag feature the Confederate battle emblem. If you have followed the flag controversy, you know this: This change would not have happened – not now – had it not been for sports.

Twelve days ago, all efforts to change the flag seemed to have failed. In effect, the movement was dead in the water. And then SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey announced the league would consider banning championship events in Mississippi until the state changed its flag. And then a group of former Mississippi athletes wrote to the NCAA, asking for similar action from the nation’s governing body of college athletics. And then, just a day later, the NCAA moved, banning regional baseball and basketball championships from the state as long as the state flag contained the Confederate symbol.

Conference USA followed suit. All the while, Mississippi college administrators, sports and otherwise, voiced their support.

Then, six days ago, Mississippi State football star Kylin Hill, reacting to a statement on Twitter from Gov. Tate Reeves, tweeted that he would not play his senior season if the flag wasn’t changed. “…I’m tired.” Hill wrote. His teammates, coaches and school administrators backed him. So did athletes from other schools.

By then, the push for flag change once again had legs – strong, swift legs – and many lawmakers began to hedge and change their stances.

The NAACP, the Legislative Black Caucus, and many left-leaning Mississippi leaders have long favored flag change. But others were climbing on the rapidly crowding wagon. Some of the state’s top business CEOs spoke out in favor of change. The Baptists joined the movement. Walmart. The Republican Party. Many, many more.

Then, the sports world chimed in again. In a dramatic show of unity and purpose, coaches and athletic directors from all the state universities gathered at the Capitol last Thursday to deliver a clear message: Change the flag. Now.

“I know first-hand what it feels like to see the Confederate flag and pretend it doesn’t have a racist, violent or oppressive overtone. It screams hate,” Nikki McCray-Penson, Mississippi State’s new women’s basketball coach, said. “There’s no place in our society for a symbol of discrimination, hatred and oppression.”

Kermit Davis, the men’s basketball coach at Ole Miss, spoke eloquently as well. “We are here to create change,” he said. “We need a flag that represents all Mississippians.”

Sunday, they got it.

And Mississippi eventually will have a new flag. Most importantly, the old one is gone – to museums, where it belongs.

As I wrote last week, sports has often showed Mississippians the way on integration and race relations. This is not new.

Surely, the sports world was not solely responsible. Just as surely, sports led the way. Sports sparked the change. I’d like to think Medgar Evers, a former Alcorn State halfback, would approve. And I know 97-year-old William Winter, a former college sports writer and editor and lifelong fan of Mississippi sports, does.

One hundred and 26 years after Mississippi adopted a flag for all the wrong reasons, that flag has been banished. Finally, in ultimate sports terminology, Mississippi won.

The post For not the first time, sports has helped Mississippians see their way to change appeared first on Mississippi Today.

Ep. 112: ‘It’s been surreal’: How lawmakers changed the Mississippi state flag

Mississippi Today’s political reporters discuss the wild few hours leading up to the moment that lawmakers voted to remove the state flag, which featured the Confederate battle emblem.

Listen here:

The post Ep. 112: ‘It’s been surreal’: How lawmakers changed the Mississippi state flag appeared first on Mississippi Today.

Mississippi furls state flag with Confederate emblem after 126 years

Eric J. Shelton/Mississippi Today

The Mississippi State Flag flies in downtown Jackson on Thursday, June 25, 2020.

Lawmakers voted on Sunday to remove the Mississippi state flag, the last in the nation featuring the Confederate battle emblem, more than 126 years after it was adopted.

The House and Senate passed a bill on Sunday that will immediately remove the state flag, and Gov. Tate Reeves said he would sign the bill into law. A nine-person commission will be appointed to develop a single new design by September, and Mississippi voters will approve or reject that design on the November 2020 ballot. In the meantime, Mississippi will have no official state flag.

The historic vote brought tears to the eyes of many lawmakers. Cheers echoed in the halls of the Mississippi State Capitol shortly after the final votes were cast, and many Mississippians who visited the building to witness the moment openly wept.

“We are better today than we were yesterday,” said Speaker of the House Philip Gunn, who authored the bill that passed on Sunday. “Today, the future has taken root in the present. Today, we and the rest of the nation can look on our state with new eyes, with pride and hope.

“We are not betraying our heritage,” Gunn continued. “We are fulfilling it.”

The flag, long a point of political contention in Mississippi, was seen by many as a symbol of hate. In 2001, Mississippi voters decided nearly 2-to-1 to keep the divisive emblem on the state flag, solidifying its place on the official state banner for nearly two decades. For years, supporters of changing the flag have not been able to garner the simple majority needed to change the controversial banner through the normal legislative process.

But the violent death of George Floyd, a Black man, in Minneapolis sparked nationwide protests that reached Mississippi and shined new light on the state flag. And in recent weeks, immense pressure mounted from religious, business, civic, university, sports and other leaders to remove the Confederate emblem from the flag.

A growing list of businesses, cities, counties and other groups either stopped flying the flag or asked leaders to change it. Religious leaders spoken out, saying changing the flag was a “moral issue.”  The NCAA, SEC, and Conference USA this month took action to ban postseason play in Mississippi until the flag was changed.

“As an African American man born in 1958, I grew up as a child of the Civil Rights Movement,” said Rep. Robert Johnson, D-Natchez and House Democratic leader. “All the things I heard from those men at the podium – that none of us went up to speak about because we’ve been saying it for years – but all those things they talked about, we’ve been feeling for years.”

Johnson began crying and paused for a moment before continuing: “What it means to me is it isn’t just words. They began to understand and feel the same thing I’ve been feeling for 61 years of my life.”

Johnson said Mississippi needs help with many problems, such as poverty and poor health care, but the nation and world “have been reluctant” to work with Mississippi and that removing the flag with a Confederate emblem will help.

“Now that this is gone, they will begin to look and see who the real Mississippi is, and see that we are more than what that flag represents,” Johnson said.

The Senate debate on Sunday lasted about two hours, with several senators arguing that the issue should go to voters instead of being made by lawmakers. Several senators rebutted that argument before passing the bill.

“I think the Mississippi Senate and me personally, we want Mississippi to have a heart and a soul,” said Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann after the vote. “Today she had one.”

The House approved the bill by a vote of 92-23 on Sunday, with eight more House members voting to approve the final bill than they did on a procedural vote on Saturday. The Senate approved the bill by a vote of 37-14, with one more Senate member voting to approve than on Saturday.

“For 100 plus years, we have been living under this flag,” said Sen. David Jordan, D-Greenwood. “We watered this land with our tears and made it rich with our bones, so it’s only fair that we have a symbol that represents us and (does) not remind us of what has happened to us.”

The debate over the state flag captured the close attention of Mississippians for weeks. By the final vote in the Senate on Sunday, the news reverberated across the state. Many prominent Mississippians expressed their appreciation.

“Removal of the Confederate battle flag from our state flag is long overdue,” former Gov. William Winter said in a statement. “I congratulate the Mississippi Legislature on their decisive action today removing this divisive symbol. Along with many committed Mississippians, I have fought for decades to change the flag, most notably during the flag referendum 20 years ago.

“I’m delighted by this positive move,” Winter continued. “I’m especially grateful at age 97 to witness this step forward by the state I love.”

Now attention will turn to the next steps in the process of developing a new state flag. The new design “will not include the Confederate battle flag but shall include the words ‘In God We Trust’,” the bill passed on Sunday reads. Should voters reject that design in November, the commission would present a new option during the 2021 legislative session, according to the resolution.

Gov. Tate Reeves, Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann and Speaker Philip Gunn will appoint three people each to the commission. The governor’s three appointees must be representatives from the Mississippi Economic Council, the Mississippi Arts Commission, and the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. Hosemann and Gunn face no specific commission appointment requirements.

The Mississippi Department of Archives and History will have up to 15 days after Reeves signs the bill into law to officially retire the current state flag.

“All eyes are on Mississippi, and today, we have made an historic decision,” said Sen. Angela Turner Ford, chairwoman of the Legislative Black Caucus. “… Today we mark a transition for Mississippi, a day where we can be proud to move forward to adopt a symbol that is inclusive, a symbol that all of us can rally behind … We’ve made a decision to move forward, and I hope Mississippians are proud of that decision.”

The post Mississippi furls state flag with Confederate emblem after 126 years appeared first on Mississippi Today.

Lawmakers plan to remove Mississippi state flag on Sunday

A protester waves the current Mississippi state flag as he sits in front of the Capitol on Saturday. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis)

Editor’s note: This is a developing story and will be updated throughout the day Sunday.

The House and Senate will begin working on Sunday to remove the Mississippi state flag, which has flown since 1894 and is the last in the nation containing the Confederate battle emblem.

The House of Representatives voted 91-23 to remove the flag. It now moves to the Senate for consideration. Legislative leaders hope the bill will be passed in both chambers by the end of business on Sunday.

Gov. Tate Reeves, who has been careful not to take a hard position on changing the state flag, said he would sign any bill lawmakers send his way.

The bill, authored by House Speaker Philip Gunn, stipulates that the current flag would be immediately removed and a nine-person commission would be created to redesign the state flag. The commission would recommend a new design by Sept. 14, and voters would approve or reject that design on Nov. 3.

The design “would not include the Confederate battle flag but shall include the words ‘In God We Trust’.” Should voters reject that design, the commission would present a new option during the 2021 legislative session, according to the resolution.

Gov. Tate Reeves, Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann and Speaker Philip Gunn would appoint three people each to the commission. The governor’s three appointees must be a representative from the Mississippi Economic Council, the Mississippi Arts Commission, and the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. There are no specific commission appointment requirements for the lieutenant governor or speaker.

The exact details of the bill are subject to change during the legislative process on Sunday. At any point, the bill could be amended to change the process of replacing the flag or even forcing a vote on whether to keep the current flag.

But based on Saturday’s vote on the rules suspension resolution, it appears House and Senate leaders have the votes to ensure the demise of the current flag that has been flying since 1894.

The vote on the controversial issue at this late date in the session is notable. Garnering a two-thirds vote to suspend rules for any reason is difficult, but particularly on the long-contentious state flag issue.

For years, supporters of changing the flag have not been able to garner the simple majority needed to change the controversial banner through the normal legislative process. But the violent death of George Floyd, a Black man, in Minneapolis sparked nationwide protests that reached Mississippi and shined new light on the state flag that many view as racist.

And in recent weeks, immense pressure mounted from religious, business, civic, university, sports and other leaders to remove the Confederate emblem from the flag. A growing list of businesses, cities, counties and other groups have either stopped flying the flag or asked leaders to change it. Religious leaders have spoken out, saying changing the flag is a “moral issue.”  The NCAA, SEC, and Conference USA this month took action to ban post-season play in the state until the flag is changed.

The post Lawmakers plan to remove Mississippi state flag on Sunday appeared first on Mississippi Today.

State flag, COVID-19 could have reverberations in November Espy vs. Hyde-Smith tilt

Rogelio V. Solis / Associated Press / Pool

Appointed U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss., answers a question while Democrat Mike Espy, left, listens during their televised Mississippi U.S. Senate debate in Jackson, Miss., Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2018. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis, Pool)

Mike Espy has been forced to take some detours from the roadmap he developed last fall to challenge United States Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith.

When Espy mapped out his plans to challenge the Republican incumbent, no one had heard of COVID-19 and few people were talking about changing the Mississippi state flag to remove its controversial Confederate battle emblem from its design.

Now both of those issues could be major factors in November when the Democrat Espy and the Republican Hyde-Smith are on the ballot in a rematch from their 2018 special election that was held to replace longtime Sen. Thad Cochran who resigned for health reasons in April 2018 and who died in May 2019.

Bobby Harrison

In 2001, Hyde-Smith was a freshman member of the Mississippi Senate when she voted with the majority and with every white member of the chamber – both Democrats and Republicans – to put on the ballot a choice between the old flag (with the Confederate battle emblem) and a new design. In that election the old flag garnered 64 percent of the vote.

The debate over whether the flag, which many view as divisive, should be replaced re-emerged in recent weeks as protests sprung up across the nation, including Mississippi, over issues of racial injustice.

Of the current debate to change the flag, Hyde-Smith recently released a statement saying, “I appreciate the views of all Mississippians, and hope to continue Mississippi’s forward momentum. Should the people of Mississippi and their elected leaders decide to begin the process of finding a more unifying banner that better represents all Mississippians and the progress we have made as a state, I would support that effort.”

Espy, who in 1986 became the first African American elected to the U.S. House from Mississippi since the Reconstruction Era and later became secretary of agriculture, has for years advocated for a new flag. He is hoping his campaign benefits in November from the current energy behind the effort to change the flag.

Last week Espy was asked to attend a news conference in the state Capitol held by a group of pastors endorsing a flag change.

“First of all what is going on right now with the movement to change the flag is really bigger than the election,” he said. “This moment is unmistakable. I think we as a state need to take advantage of this moment and change the flag.”

But as it relates to the election, he said, “I love what I am seeing. There is an energy for change. I want to be that change in Mississippi.”

Despite the energy that Espy hopes will coalesce behind his campaign, he faces a daunting challenge.

Like Espy, Hyde-Smith is a historic figure in Mississippi politics as the first woman elected to national office. And Republicans, facing difficult Senate elections in other states, will make the re-election of Hyde-Smith a priority as they strive to maintain their Senate majority. But will there be traditional Hyde-Smith supporters, who are strong proponents of the old flag, who stay away from the polls in November because she was not tough enough on the issue of keeping the flag?

Espy will need to ensure a heavy turnout among the state’s African American voters while making inroads with white voters that he was not able to make in 2018.

Espy had planned to spend much of the early part of 2020 traveling the state, meeting people and trying to build grassroots support among both Black and white Mississippians. The pandemic has forced Espy to a large extent to rely on internet meetings to try to build that support. He is having multiple internet town halls and last week was on an internet conference with 700 Mississippi pastors whom, he said, are supporting his campaign.

Hyde-Smith also has had to deal with the limitations placed on her campaign by the coronavirus but is doing so as the incumbent and the heavy favorite to maintain her seat.

“Yes, we are gearing up the campaign now that the state has reopened,” Hyde-Smith campaign spokesperson Justin Brasell recently said. “She has already held some telephone town halls and we will be opening campaign field offices in the near future.”

The coronavirus is not only impacting campaigning, but could affect voter turnout in November.

Despite the threat the coronavirus could pose, it appears the Legislature will not take the steps most other states have taken to enhance early voting, both in person and by mail, to help reduce the long lines at the precincts on election day.

In other words, the coronavirus could negatively impact turnout. In 2018, Hyde-Smith defeated Espy by almost 66,000 votes or 53.6 percent to 46.4 percent.

Whether the energy from the flag or the fear over the COVID-19 crisis could change the outcome remains to be seen.

The post State flag, COVID-19 could have reverberations in November Espy vs. Hyde-Smith tilt appeared first on Mississippi Today.

Your Personal Data Is Worth Money. Andrew Yang Wants to Get You Paid

Contact tracing has been a somewhat controversial tool for fighting coronavirus in the US. American consumers wanted privacy to be preserved, so Apple and Google set about devising an API that could help track potential Covid-19 outbreaks while keeping users’ identities anonymous. But what many of us seemed to forget during conversations about contact tracing is that we’re already living under a digital microscope, with multiple companies following and recording our every move.

Indeed, just going about our daily routines can generate hundreds of data points, from where we went to how much time we spent there to what we bought, ate, or drank. Essentially, we’re freely giving away all kinds of data to companies that analyze, package, sell, and profit from it—not just every day, but every hour.

Former Democratic presidential candidate and entrepreneur Andrew Yang wants to change this, and he’s rolling out a framework to do so. Yang is most well-known for his support of a universal basic income of $1,000 a month for every American. UBI would be a central tenet of building what he calls a human-centered economy, which entails a form of capitalism that measures economic success by peoples’ well-being rather than by corporate profits or GDP.

Putting lower-earning citizens on a more equal basis from which to pursue opportunities is one piece of a human-centered economy—that’s where UBI comes in. Dismantling the systems that allow big companies to rake in billions while the average Joe lives paycheck to paycheck is another piece—and that’s where Yang’s newly-launched Data Dividend Project (DDP) comes in.

On its website, the DDP is described as “a movement dedicated to taking back control of our personal data.” There’s not a ton of information about how the project is going to accomplish this, but it seems like a big part of it is raising awareness and mobilizing people; as the site states more than once, individual consumers can’t do much to fight big companies or request payment for data, and the more people involved, the more leverage they’re likely to have. Yang’s ultimate goal is for Americans to be able to claim their data as a property right and get paid for it if they choose to share it.

By signing up, you give the DDP permission to act as an authorized agent to exercise your legal rights under the recently-enacted California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The act went into effect on January 1 of this year, and it gives consumers in California the right to know how their personal data is being collected and shared, the right to request that their data be deleted, and the right to opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal information. The act also prohibits businesses from selling the personal info of consumers under age 16 without explicit consent.

The law only covers California right now, but Maine and Nevada recently passed similar bills, and according to the DDP’s website, 10 other states are considering doing so. If you sign up and your state doesn’t yet have a relevant bill, you’ll be notified when (or if) one is passed in the future. Europe is a couple years ahead of the US; its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect in May of 2018.

According to the DDP’s website, data brokering is a $200 billion industry. “We are completely outgunned by tech companies,” Yang told The Verge. “We’re just presented with these terms and conditions. No one ever reads them. You just click on them and hope for the best. And unfortunately, the best has not happened.”

Yang has a point. When was the last time you thoroughly read the terms and conditions—and understood all the legal gibberish therein—before signing up for a service or downloading an app?

Oh, never? Same here.

But Yang’s Data Dividend quest is likely to be an uphill battle. There’s some serious distance between having the right to know how your data is being collected and getting cash in your pocket from the companies collecting it.

A philosophy called dataism, first described in 2013, takes the opposite stance: dataists advocate for handing over as much information and power as possible to data-driven algorithms, thus allowing the free flow of data to unlock unprecedented innovation and progress.

In a pretty big way, we’re all benefiting from the way companies use our data; we get to use apps and services for “free” and the providers get our data in exchange. They then use that data to (among other things, of course) improve the product.

GPS apps, for example, are free to use, and they save us time and stress. We’ve accepted the fact that they may be tracking or recording our movements as part of the deal, and most of us would rather give up that data than pay for the app. Similarly, Facebook is a free, easy way to keep in touch with your friends, and those of us who use it have tacitly agreed to let the platform collect all kinds of information about us in exchange.

The catch, though, is that especially in Facebook’s case, most of us didn’t realize just how far this went until it was too late to do anything about it (other than deleting your account, but even that wouldn’t erase years’ worth of data already collected).

Last year’s Netflix movie The Great Hack detailed the dark side of data collection, centered around the 2016 Cambridge Analytica scandal. The movie describes how “psychometric profiles” exist for you, me, and all of our friends. The data collected from our use of digital services can be packaged in a way that gives companies insight into our habits, preferences, and even our personalities. With this information, they can do anything from show us an ad for a pair of shoes we’ll probably like to try to change our minds about which candidate to vote for in an election.

With so much of our data already out there, plus the fact that most of us will likely keep using the free apps we’ve enjoyed for years, could it be too late to try to fundamentally change the way this model works?

Maybe not. Think of it this way: we have a long, increasingly automated and digitized future ahead of us, and data is only going to become more important, valuable, and powerful with time. There’s a line (which some would say we’ve already crossed) beyond which the amount of data companies have access to and the way they can manipulate it for their benefit will become eerie and even dystopian.

So have at it, Mr. Yang. Though they say the best things in life are free, the reality is that most things come with a cost—monetary or otherwise.

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons