Home Blog Page 607

Fearing coronavirus, many rural black women avoid hospitals to give birth at home

Eric J. Shelton/Mississippi Today, Report For America

Black women in Southern states have less access to health care providers and travel longer distances to care.

Pregnant women in Tennessee, Arkansas and Mississippi have been calling nonstop to CHOICES Midwifery Practice in Memphis, but the center is booked.

The callers are terrified that they or their babies will contract the novel coronavirus if they deliver in hospitals. Some women live in rural areas far from hospitals and obstetrics units. The center’s clients are primarily black and other women of color.

“They’ve told us they’re going to risk it all and have an unassisted home birth,” said Nikia Grayson, a certified nurse midwife and director of perinatal services. “That’s very scary, and that’s what people are researching and seeing as a viable option.”

Many pregnant women are seeking out midwives to deliver their babies in homes or birthing centers rather than in hospitals, where they fear being exposed to the virus. But midwives and other maternal health experts say desperate women also are delivering without any medical assistance.

“It can go left real fast,” Grayson said.

Midwives across the country say they are stretched to accommodate additional deliveries because of the pandemic, while taking precautions to protect themselves and their clients. Midwives from Mississippi and Tennessee who deliver in homes are traveling to the rural areas around Memphis to help, Grayson said. But it’s dangerous to cross state lines without knowing where to go in an emergency.

The stakes are especially high for rural black women soon to give birth in Southern states. They have less access to health care providers and travel longer distances to care, while systemic racism and health care inequities put their lives at risk.

The coronavirus pandemic exposes a fragile health care system that already marginalized and traumatized pregnant black women, said Dr. Joia Crear-Perry, president of the National Birth Equity Collaborative.

“The intersectionality of being a black woman and that the rural South chose not to provide insurance coverage is a deadly combination for many,” Crear-Perry said.

In Mississippi, the state Department of Health should address the concerns of pregnant women and families and discourage unassisted home births, said Wengora Thompson, who manages the Jackson Safer Childbirth Experience, a project funded by Merck and the Kellogg Foundation.


Thompson said a local doctor told her that a family had attempted a recent home birth to avoid local hospitals. The baby needed resuscitation and is in intensive care.

“It’s important that they hear from some official body or some trusted source that this isn’t the best option,” Thompson said.

But even before this pandemic, some black women were reluctant to deliver their babies in hospitals, Grayson said. Experts point to systemic health care inequities and institutional racism.

Black women often delay prenatal care to avoid racist experiences with the health care system, and are more likely to experience racial discrimination, according to studies republished by the National Institutes of Health.

And when they express their concerns to medical professionals, they’re often not heard. Even tennis star Serena Williams had to demand a CT scan and blood thinner when she experienced shortness of breath following a cesarean section and feared she may have had a blood clot.

During the pandemic, hospitals such as the Kaiser Permanente Medical Group of Northern California are offering inductions to women near the end of their third trimester. The goal is to get healthy people out the door before hospitals are overwhelmed by a peak in coronavirus infections.

Advocates say it’s important for women to have choices, but also question whether women may feel pressured to induce pregnancy. They’re also concerned that an increase in inductions will lead to riskier births and premature infants.

Inductions don’t benefit all pregnant and birthing women, said Jamarah Amani, founder of the National Black Midwives Alliance. In a pandemic, some physicians take less time to explain a patient’s options, she said. Studies and first-person narratives underscore communication gaps, such as physicians spending less time with pregnant black women, dumbing down explanations and failing to fully answer questions.

“Once again,” Amani said, “we’re seeing a situation where the needs and rights of birthing people are being pushed to the side.”

Barriers to care

Among the Deep South states, only Louisiana expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to insure more low-income people. Many poor women have access to health insurance only when they are pregnant.

Black women are more likely to have pre-existing conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes and asthma, according to the National Center for Health Statistics and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Those illnesses increase the risk of death from the coronavirus and may go undiagnosed prior to pregnancy.

The U.S. maternal and infant mortality rates are higher than in most developed countries and are hitting black women the hardest.

Black women are two-to-three times more likely to die from causes related to pregnancy than white women, regardless of income or education. The disparity increases with the mother’s age.

Black women’s babies are twice as likely to die, especially black babies born in rural areas, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

There is little public demographic data on midwives. But black midwives and advocates say there are few black midwives in the South, where restrictions on midwifery make it more difficult to practice.

Certified professional midwives, or CPMs, who deliver in homes, often are left out of health care systems and face legal barriers to practice with autonomy.

Unlike certified nurse midwives who attend nursing school, CPM training is in out-of-hospital settings. In some states, Medicaid reimbursement for CPMs is insufficient, while private insurance may not cover their services.

Despite the barriers, midwifery care is proven to reduce rates of unnecessary interventions and improve outcomes for moms and babies. Advocates such as Crear-Perry say some black women choose home births to avoid over-medicalized care. They also fear the medical system and its legacy of mistreating blacks.

Some advocates are concerned that the challenges plaguing black Americans can’t be addressed if leaders don’t acknowledge black socioeconomic disparities. A senior state health official in Mississippi recently told reporters he did not know why COVID-19 appears to be disproportionately affecting blacks and deferred to other officials to explain.

“In a state as seeped in structural racism as Mississippi, the fact that someone of that stature wasn’t able to communicate that effectively and said they didn’t know was really alarming,” said Felicia Brown-Williams, Mississippi state director for Planned Parenthood Southeast Advocates.

With lower COVID-19 testing rates in states with larger black and poor populations, blacks who couldn’t be admitted to hospitals or lacked access to care are dying outside of hospitals, Crear-Perry said.

“The next level of teasing out this data is counting the deaths that are happening in homes,” Crear-Perry said. “I’m afraid that when we start doing that, we’re going to start seeing some maternal deaths as well because people are not making it to the hospital.”

Local influencers

More black midwives could be part of the solution. Black midwives have long been beloved matriarchs in their communities. As local influencers, they encouraged breastfeeding, delivered public health messages and instilled confidence. But over the past century, black midwives have been whittled down to a handful.

A century ago, thousands of midwives practiced in several Southern states. They attended more than two-thirds of the African American births in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina.

But state efforts to professionalize midwifery and training that began in the 1920s, and a push for more hospital births under a physician’s care, precipitated a steep decline in their ranks. Alongside racist tropes that characterized black midwives as ignorant, superstitious and dirty, they were blamed for high rates of infant and maternal mortality.

In the late 1940s, Mississippi began to retire elderly midwives while also making it difficult to obtain or renew midwifery permits. By 1975, 98% of babies were delivered in hospitals, and there were 259 registered lay midwives. By 1982, there were 13, according to “Protect the Mother and Baby: Mississippi Lay Midwives and Public Health.”

In the South, Mississippi, Georgia and North Carolina are among at least 15 states where CPMs have no path to licensure. Georgia CPMs lost their ability to legally practice after the state’s rules changed in 2015, but Republican state Rep. Karen Mathiak has introduced a bill to license and regulate CPMs.

A CPM has filed a federal lawsuit against the president of the Georgia Board of Nursing because it’s threatened her with fines for publicly identifying herself as a midwife. She says the restriction violates her First Amendment rights.

For the first time in more than 40 years, Alabama began issuing licenses to its CPMs last year.

However, certified nurse midwives like Grayson in Memphis typically practice in birthing centers or hospitals, although she also does home births. They are legally recognized in all 50 states.

Grayson says she is the only midwife and local provider in Memphis who does home or hospital births. Her clinic will open Memphis’ first birthing center in June and is hiring more nurse midwives to meet local interest.

Florida is a model for what’s possible in the South and across the country, said Amani, the National Black Midwives Alliance founder. Florida provides educational paths to licensure and requires Medicaid and private insurance to cover midwifery care.

Of 200 licensed midwives in Florida, about 15 are black, Amani said. Some states have few black midwives who may legally deliver outside of hospitals and in homes, and others have none, according to Amani and other advocates.

More black women would choose home births if it weren’t so hard to find black midwives, said Shafia Monroe, a black midwife and consultant who’s led national efforts to increase the number of midwives and doulas of color. Medical professionals often don’t educate pregnant women on their options for midwifery care.

“For black people around the country, the majority don’t know what midwives do, or they’re afraid,” Monroe said.

OB-GYNs tend not to like home births because it’s not a part of their training, said Crear-Perry, who’s also an OB-GYN. “All we see is the catastrophe.”

Crear-Perry and others would like to see a health care system that embraces the model of midwifery care, which includes home visits, checkups and other personal touches. They also want better integration with existing health care systems to keep women safe, especially during the coronavirus crisis.

“The capacity of the midwives that are trained is already strained,” said Jennie Joseph, a British-trained midwife and founder of a midwifery school and birthing center in Winter Garden, Florida. “We might want to consider physicians even delivering outside of hospitals to maintain that safety for the mothers.”

The post Fearing coronavirus, many rural black women avoid hospitals to give birth at home appeared first on Mississippi Today.

“We are still in the eye of the storm”: Reeves extends shelter-in-place order, reopens lakes and beaches

Eric J. Shelton/Mississippi Today, Report For America

Gov. Tate Reeves speaks to media about his shelter-in-place order for Lauderdale County during a press conference at the State of Mississippi Woolfolk Building in Jackson, Miss., Tuesday, March 31, 2020.

Beaches and lakes can reopen Monday, and even businesses deemed to be nonessential can reopen for curbside service, under an amended shelter-in-place order being enacted by Gov. Tate Reeves.

Reeves, who is in his fourth month as the state’s chief executive officer, announced the modified shelter-in-place order during a Friday morning news conference. The new order to combat the coronavirus will last a week, but he did not rule out reluctantly extending it.

The initial order, which began on April 3, is set to expire at 8 a.m. Monday. The second order begins Monday morning so the modifications, such as the opening of the lakes and beaches, will not be in place this weekend.

Of the shelter-in-place order, Reeves said, “This is not a sustainable position long term. I want it to end as soon as it possibly can.”

Reeves said, “I wanted to announce that we can all ease up and reopen today, but we can’t. We are still in the eye of the storm” in trying to curb the impact of  COVID-19 by social distancing and limiting travel.

Reeves and state Health Officer Thomas Dobbs, who also attended the news conference in the Woolfolk State Office Building, said the state is still near its peak or plateau in terms of the number of Mississippians contracting and becoming ill from the coronavirus. But they expressed growing optimism that the state’s health care system is not going to be overwhelmed by COVID-19. They credited Mississippians being willing to practice social distancing for lessening the impact.

Still Mississippi reported more than 250 new cases for both Tuesday and Wednesday, though the number of new cases dropped significantly on Thursday. All total, the state has had 3,793 confirmed cases and 140 deaths.

While the coronavirus is taking a toll on the health of Mississippians, Reeves pointed out it also is having dire consequences on the Mississippi economy. In recent weeks, the state has had 130,000 unemployment claims, a 14,000 percent increase, not counting people who cannot get through to file their claims.

“This is insane—the bleeding has to stop. Lives depend on this as well,” Reeves said Thursday on social media. “Please pray for wisdom as we consider all options. Our people can’t take much more.”

To try to help the economic situation, Reeves said his new order, beginning Monday, will allow nonessential businesses to offer curbside services. He used the example of a local florist where a person could phone in an order and drive by and have it delivered to his or her vehicle. Or presumably, a person could purchase via the telephone or online an item from a retail or clothing store and pick it up curbside. Restaurants already are allowed to provide curbside or drive-through services.

Reeves said it makes sense to help local merchants as well as reducing the volume of traffic in large grocery stores or other big box stores that have been deemed as essential.

As far as the lakes and beaches, he said local government still could close them at their discretion. And when at those areas the same rules of social distancing apply – staying six feet apart and no groups of more than 10.

He said the number of people who could be on a boat should be half the maximum capacity of the vessel.

Reeves normally holds his near-daily news conferences in the afternoon, but held this one Friday morning because he is touring damage from Sunday’s storms with acting-Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf. The Sunday storms have claimed 14 lives. And Reeves said the two-mile wide tornado that tore a 200-mile long path through south Mississippi has now been deemed the widest tornado in the state’s history and the third widest ever nationally.

The post “We are still in the eye of the storm”: Reeves extends shelter-in-place order, reopens lakes and beaches appeared first on Mississippi Today.

A tour of Mississippi: Canton

Color your way through Mississippi with me! Click below to download a coloring sheet of Canton.

For all of my coloring sheets, click here.

Don’t miss my next coloring sheet! Sign up below to receive it straight to your inbox.

The Today signup

Don’t miss my art lessons — live every Friday at noon.

The post A tour of Mississippi: Canton appeared first on Mississippi Today.

Marshall Ramsey: End of the Rope

Small businesses are at the end of their rope while a federal aid program runs out of money.

The post Marshall Ramsey: End of the Rope appeared first on Mississippi Today.

The Governor’s Latest Executive Order Extends Stay at Home Order

Governor Tate Reeves has signed Executive Order 1473, extending his Stay at Home Order and allowing for adjustments to “non-essential” operations.

The Governor's latest Executive Order pertaining to Covid-19

Posted by City of Tupelo – Mayor's Office on Friday, April 17, 2020

April 17, 2020 (Friday): Opinion

Today’s main story was Trump’s morning tweets:

“LIBERATE MINNESOTA!”

“LIBERATE MICHIGAN!”

“LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!”

April 17, 2020 (Friday)Today’s main story was Trump’s morning tweets: “LIBERATE MINNESOTA!”“LIBERATE…

Posted by Heather Cox Richardson on Saturday, April 18, 2020

The media has been on fire ever since. A president advocating a violent overthrow of three states with Democratic governors is unprecedented, and quite possibly illegal—Mary McCord, acting US assistant attorney general for national security from 2016-2017 pointed out that “advocating overthrow of government” is a federal crime. It is also a state crime in Minnesota, Michigan, and Virginia.

What is behind these tweets? After all, just last evening, Trump announced that it was not yet time to open state businesses, and that state governors should make their own decisions about when to restart their economies during the novel coronavirus pandemic. So why is he now telling people to overthrow those governments?

It is, in part, diversion. The response of the Trump administration to the pandemic crisis has been bumbling, inadequate, and quite possibly corrupt—the apparently political distribution of crucial medical supplies and now the Payroll Protection Program loans designed to help small businesses is drawing scrutiny. The economy, on which Trump pinned his hopes for reelection, is in free fall. As his approval rating drops, Trump wants to energize voters to focus not on his handling of the coronavirus, but instead on blaming Democratic leaders for the economic crisis.

But there is a larger story behind Trump’s incendiary tweets. Since the 1980s, the Republican Party has retained power by insisting that its leaders were defending America from dangerous “liberals,” who wanted to redistribute wealth from hardworking, religious, usually white, taxpayers, to “special interests.” In the years since President Ronald Reagan, there has been less and less nuance in that narrative and, by the time of President Barack Obama, no room to compromise. The division of the nation into “us” versus “them” has come to override any attempt at actual problem solving; Republican lawmakers simply address national problems with what their ideological narrative requires: cuts to taxes, regulation, and social welfare programs.

The coronavirus pandemic requires us to unite for our own safety, but members of the Republican Party can only see the world in partisan terms. Boston College political scientist David Hopkins notes that “The contemporary Republican Party has been built to wage ideological and partisan conflict more than to manage the governor or solve specific social problems.” Republicans remain so consumed by their war on Democrats and liberals they cannot fathom working together to fight the pandemic.

Instead, they have continued to prioritize “owning the libs” over public safety. After first calling concern about the virus a Democratic hoax, then refusing to shut down states, Republicans are now calling Democratic governors trying to limit social contact authoritarians. Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell, the man who oversees our entire intelligence community– the community that repeatedly tried to get Trump to take the novel coronavirus seriously in January and February– tweeted a picture of the US Constitution with the heading: “SIGNED PERMISSION SLIP TO LEAVE YOUR HOUSE.”

Trump’s tweets are part of this larger political narrative, one that the Fox News Channel is instrumental in driving. The protest this week against Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan was not organic; it was organized by a political group, the Michigan Conservative Coalition, and it garnered attention far beyond its small numbers thanks to right-wing media. FNC personality Jeanine Pirro said of the Michigan protesters: “God bless them, it’s going to happen all over the country.” FNC personality Laura Ingraham tweeted a video of it, saying: “Time to get your freedom back.” FNC personality Tucker Carlson interviewed a representative of the MCC on his show; the person got another interview on “Fox & Friends” the next day. Indeed, Trump’s “LIBERATE MINNESOTA!” tweet came just after a program on the Fox News Channel ran a story on protests at the Minnesota governor’s office by a group called “Liberate Minnesota.”

The goal of this enterprise is to keep Republicans in office in 2020. The latest filing for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) leadership committee shows that four of the top five donors are executives for the Fox News Channel. Lachlan Murdoch, Rupert Murdoch, Viet Dinh, FNC’s Legal Adviser and Policy Director, and the president of 21st Century Fox all gave $20,600.

Like Republican policies in general right now, though, the attack on physical distancing is not popular. Polls show that at least two-thirds of Americans are worried that states will lift restrictions on physical distancing too quickly, while only 32% worry they will reopen too slowly. While no one wants the economy to crash, we are generally in agreement that lives should come first, and that to reopen the economy we need widespread testing, low case numbers, and sufficient hospital capacity, just as Trump himself said yesterday.

Without those conditions, getting people to reengage in the public sphere is going to be a hard sell. But we don’t have the tests we need, and the federal government has abdicated its role in obtaining them. (A call on Friday with Vice President Mike Pence about the lack of testing left Senate Democrats “livid.” And even-keeled Independent Maine Senator Angus King reportedly said “I have never been so mad about a phone call in my life.”)

And so we are back to Trump’s central political problem: the pandemic requires a party and a president that can unite with Democrats and can implement policies to solve a deadly crisis. That is not today’s Republican Party or its current leader.

Stirring up violence against Democratic governors would address the problem by feeding the culture wars that stoke base Republican voters. The nation would appear bitterly divided, and the need for a strong leader to restore order would seem apparent to those who might otherwise be sliding away from the erratic president. As any powerful person does, Trump wields influence over certain of his supporters, and his words are terribly dangerous. When he repeatedly called CNN “the enemy of the people,” for example, someone sent bombs to CNN’s studios.

Former Republican governor of New Jersey Christine Todd Whitman tweeted: “This [president] is now truly getting out of control. In talking about “liberating” the states, he is using language that could well lead to rioting. No one has done more to undermine our constitution and destroy our country’s values than [Trump].”

But while Trump’s supporters are trying to hold on to power by sparking a dramatic struggle with Democratic leaders, it may be that the coronavirus has the last word. While cases are leveling off in states that shut down, new hotspots are emerging in states that do not have stay-at-home orders. In the past week, cases in Oklahoma rose 53%. Arkansas cases went up 60%, Nebraska’s 74%, and Iowa’s 82%. South Dakota’s cases went up by 205%.

—-

You can sign up for this free newsletter at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com

—-

Notes:

McConnell:

CNN bombs:

Whitman:

Coverage : https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-call-liberate-michigan-virginia-minnesota-governors-protests-supporters

Hopkins and partisanship: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/4/16/21223600/hyper-partisanship-republicans-coronavirus-trump-hopkins

Polls: https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/17/politics/donald-trump-polls-coronavirus/index.html

PPP: https://abc7chicago.com/business/chicago-small-business-owners-question-who-got-ppp-loans-as-funds-run-out/6111756/

FNC, Liberate Minnesota:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/16/why-fox-news-republicans-are-promoting-social-distancing-backlash/

conference call: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/17/senate-democrats-mike-pence-conference-call-192868

Intelligence community warnings: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/us-intelligence-reports-from-january-and-february-warned-about-a-likely-pandemic/2020/03/20/299d8cda-6ad5-11ea-b5f1-a5a804158597_story.html

Reopening: https://thehill.com/homenews/news/public-global-health/493210-two-thirds-of-americans-worry-states-will-lift

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/17/politics/republican-governors-stay-at-home-coronavirus/index.html

Guess it Matters to Me S2:01

Season 2 

Episode 1  

The 5 Words That Make My Skin Crawl

Description

I am okay with people when they have a bad experience and want to make social media aware of it if it is a legitimate gripe. There are those times when someone should have stayed at home instead of going out because they didn’t get the service, they thought they should have. The way their go online and write reviews makes you wonder if they were looking for every mistake so they could run to the review page and post it. They type those 5 words that make my skin crawl and I’m not even a restaurant owner – I will never be back! Typing it was difficult. I’m holding nothing back today! I am criticizing the self-appointed critics!

Intro

Today is a day that I get to announce something that is exciting to me. I am the guy that always sees himself as the underachiever and the last guy picked for the Jack and Jill softball game. If there were such a category in school for most likely to never be remembered again – they would have misspelled my name and used the wrong picture. I’ve gotten trophies when I was younger where my name was misspelled. Heck – I’ve played an entire season of t-ball as a youngster and during the trophy ceremony the head coach didn’t even know I was on the team. I was mistaken for a girl in head start my first day. So, receiving good news comes as a shock and utter surprise. I am excited to announce that OUR TUPELO will be hosting my podcast alongside, anchor.fm and Spotify. That means, for those of you that do not want to download an app to hear my podcast – all you must do is log on to ourtupelo.com and there I’ll be. Now, this also means that I am narrowing down my topics a little. I don’t think I want to overstep anyone with material, so the podcast will still be an effort to write comedy and find it in what matters to everyone else. The only difference is that I am going to be discussing topics that will find themselves closer to the All-American City. I also hope there is an interest beyond the borders of Mississippi for anyone wishing to visit our area. I will not try to shed a negative light on anyone or their businesses – but if you make it too easy, then it’s your own fault. I will, from time to time, spotlight local musical artist and businesses to give them a shout-out as well as talk about things that – you GUESSED it – matters to me. Sit back and buckle up and let’s see where this sense of humor of mine takes us!


OUR TUPELO SPOT

Part 1

Right out of the gate I want to criticize critics. You know the type I am talking about. No, not the legitimate gripe where someone goes on social media and gives an honest review of a business or service that has less than stepped up to the plate – but that person that looks for every stinking thing wrong just so they can run to social media and type the words – I WILL NEVER BE BACK. OH, MY FUDGE JUICE PERCILLA – you mean to tell me that you took the time to try a business because someone bragged on it and it didn’t meet your expectations? GIVE ME A BREAK! You did not have anything better to do than to think you were Gordan Ramsey and for one second thought that anyone really cared that you will never be back? I’m pretty sure that jumping on social media and proclaiming that to the 15 people that actually read your Facebook page appreciates you saving them from such a horrible experience. IF ONLY that were the case. No, you go on to a review page and give every tiny detail like you were calling in red zone strike from a special-ops unit. Some of the reviews are not reviews they are trying to tear down an establishment that did not meet your expectations. Instead of telling the truth that you didn’t care for it  – you have a different set of standards – you wouldn’t know a good steak if the cow birthed it with grade A stamped right on it’s rump roast! I wished for every person that ever typed the words – I WILL NEVER BE BACK there was a law that allowed everyone to show up at their home and eat their cooking with one rule – you HAVE to find something wrong with it. Now, let us really be honest. All you really wanted was to be treated to a standard that may be farfetched and, in your rant, and declaration of never returning you wanted to make the owner cower to that of a humble servant and kiss your boot. This, of course, is why I do not own a restaurant. If I did – the theme would be – I am going to treat you like your mama would. If you don’t like my cooking you don’t have to eat it – I may not make you pay for it – but if you tell me you are never coming back because I had to recook a perfectly good steak 6 ways to Sunday because “you know a good steak,” well that would mean you are no longer a customer. Since you are no longer a customer – I can track down where you work and call your boss to tell them I do not think you are doing an excellent job. I think you should be fired. Harsh? Why is that harsh – that is exactly what you are doing trying to persuade people to stop dining at a restaurant. You should try this the next time you get to go out an eat – post pandemic. I suggest you pick somewhere you have never been. Do your best to get an honest review from someone like Jeff Jones. Go to a locally owned establishment with the only notion that you are going to try something you might enjoy. Don’t bother yourself with whether or not anyone is getting better service than your server may be giving you. If you don’t feel like you are being taken care of then catch the manager and politely tell them it’s your first time there and you have been waiting longer than you thought – is there an issue? Then, enjoy your food and if the manager offers you anything for your trouble accept it or don’t but don’t run to social media and pretend you didn’t at least give them the benefit of the doubt. Also, if it feels like I’m picking on you – I am. I also know that there are some restaurants that shouldn’t be allowed to open a can tuna much less try to serve food to the public – I’ll get them later.

TRANSITION 



Part 2

I want to give a shout-out to one of our local musicians. I want to give a virtual high-five to Dr. Jeff Spencer. Jeff is one of those musicians that if you have ever had the privilege of playing on a set with him; you find yourself slobbering all over your own instrument watching him. He is a true expert in his craft because he is always trying to learn and get better at what he does. He is humble and he knows a lot about rock and roll music. If you just learning how to play guitar find Jeff in his element and be inspired.

My shout out business is the Nautical Whimsey. First, because I like saying it. Second, because they work hard to make every meal spectacular. I’ve dined there several times with my wife and with a group. It didn’t matter if it was a party of two or twelve, they made the occasion special to us. If you visit Tupelo, they currently have curbside to go orders available. However, once our shelter in place is finished the weather should be exactly right to take a stroll downtown and have a meal at the Nautical Whimsey.

Thanks for hanging out with me on this episode and just as always – if it matters to you –  I GUESS it matters to me. 

A World Without Sports

Lars Dzikus, University of Tennessee

Baseball’s opening day came and went. The Olympics have been postponed. Football in the fall? Don’t count on it.

With COVID-19 infections and deaths rising each day, the cancellation of live sporting events might seem like an afterthought. But in the coming weeks and months, their absence will undoubtedly be felt.

This isn’t the first time sports have been put on hold. During previous crises and conflicts, sports have been stopped. But in the past, the reprieve was brief; sports went on to act as a way to bring Americans together, helping them persevere and, ultimately, heal.

This time’s different.

An American ‘religion’

Sports are so important to so many of us that some have likened them to a modern religion, replete with rituals, saints and shrines.

“Sports are more than games, meets and matches,” sociologist Jay Coakley has observed. “They’re important aspects of social life that have meanings going far beyond scores and performance statistics.”

Research suggests that watching sports can benefit physical well-being. Fandom can also be linked to psychological benefits such as an increased sense of belonging. When spectators experience social connectedness to other fans, it can reduce negative emotions, like depression and isolation.

Enduring – and emerging stronger

For these reasons, sports, during times of crisis, often act as a salve.

At the onset of the Civil War, baseball was less than two decades old, and the first two years of the war hit the young sport hard. As several players enlisted and others focused on civilian war efforts, many clubs folded or played reduced schedules.

Still, as historian George Kirsch has noted, baseball “endured the trial of civil war remarkably well, persisting and even progressing under trying circumstances.” Union soldiers brought the game to the battlefield, playing to stay fit and get some much-needed distraction. In the process, they exposed many of their fellow countrymen to the game for the first time. After the war, baseball’s popularity boomed.

Sports went on to endure both World War I and the 1918 flu pandemic.

A baseball player dons a face mask. George Rinhart/Corbis via Getty Images

The ranks of college football players, for example, were vastly depleted, with many student-athletes going into active duty. Others joined the newly established Student Army Training Corps on their campuses and were often kept out of practices and games. Still, the games went on, with freshmen permitted to fill the rosters.

Overseas, in Europe, millions of American troops continued to engage in baseball, football and boxing behind the front lines as a respite from the drudgery of trench warfare. Sports and athletics, according to historian Steve Pope, became “central components of military life.”

The first wave of the flu arrived in the U.S. in the spring of 1918, but the second, stronger wave hit right at the onset of the college football season.

Given the shortage of players due to the war, discussions to cancel the 1918 season were already underway when the flu returned.

Michigan had played only one game when the governor shut down public gatherings. A game against rival Michigan Agricultural College – now Michigan State – was postponed for concerns that “prolonged cheering at the games would weaken the throats of the spectators, thus making them more susceptible to the disease.” Nationwide, hundreds of college games were canceled.

Nonetheless, as flu cases subsided in November 1918, Michigan was able to play four more games. Undefeated Michigan and Pitt were titled co-champions, despite having played only five games each.

Bringing the country together

Following the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, some wondered whether it was even appropriate to hold sporting events. Then President Franklin D. Roosevelt sent the so-called “green light letter” to Major League Baseball commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis in January 1942.

In it, Roosevelt wrote that “it would be best for the country to keep baseball going.” The people, he added, “ought to have a chance for recreation.” The 1942 season went on as scheduled. Women’s-only baseball leagues also became popular during this period. At its peak in 1948, the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League attracted close to 1 million spectators.

More recently, 9/11 presented a major challenge to sports. As sporting events could present perfect targets for terrorists, security concerns and costs skyrocketed.

On the day of the attacks, Major League Baseball immediately postponed all 15 games; over the next six days, 91 games were canceled. The last time the league had canceled games without a player strike had been D-Day in 1944.

Yet games resumed on Sept. 17, and the World Series was played in November. The Super Bowl was also pushed back, but went on as planned.

According to sports scholar Rebecca Kraus, baseball’s return, in particular, “provided an emotional release, sense of hope and a place for the community to gather in its time of need, thus fulfilling its role as the national pastime.”

President George W. Bush throws the first pitch of Game 3 of the 2001 World Series.

E-sports into the void?

The current sports stoppage, however, is unprecedented. It touches every level of every game, in every country in the world, from the Olympics down to pickup basketball.

In the battle against the coronavirus, sports cannot be relied upon. In fact, sports are among the culprits: Officials have discovered that a February soccer match in Milan, Italy, led to a massive outbreak that accelerated the spread of the virus.

In all of this, there’s an important point to consider. We’re still processing the many jarring changes to our routines. And when sports return in a year or two, our perception of this strange hiatus will have certainly changed.

We might marvel at how quickly sports bounce back and pick up right where they left off. At the same time, when sports do resume, who could blame fans for being wary about attending games?

Sports shouldn’t be taken for granted. In the great scheme of things, organized sports are a relatively recent phenomenon – less than 200 years old in the United States. Who knows what sports will look like 50, 100 or 200 years from now. Starting at about 776 B.C., the ancient Olympic Games lasted for 12 centuries. Today they’re long gone.

Could, over time, the steady threat of global calamity also relegate our current conception of sports to ancient history?

Already, one relative newcomer to the sporting scene has filled a void. Despite some initial hiccups, televised e-sport tournaments are still being held as planned.

With 1.3 million viewers following a virtual race, the recent inaugural eNASCAR iRacing Pro Invitational Series on Fox Sports became the most-watched e-sport competition in American television history.

[You need to understand the coronavirus pandemic, and we can help. Read The Conversation’s newsletter.]

Lars Dzikus, Associate Professor in Sport Studies, University of Tennessee

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Capital One Arena, home of the Washington Capitals, sits empty. AP Photo/Nick Wass

Millions of Essential Workers Are Being Left Out of COVID-19 Workplace Safety Protections, Thanks to OSHA

0

Even as the federal worker-safety agency has been inundated with complaints, it has rolled back safety standards and virtually eliminated non-health care workplaces from government protection.

by Michael GrabellBernice Yeung and Maryam Jameel April 16, 7:52 p.m. EDT

As news emerged that the novel coronavirus was infecting hundreds of workers in meatpacking plants, Gregoria Rivas began worrying that her chicken processing facility in North Carolina wasn’t doing enough to protect workers like her from the virus.

There was no social distancing, she said. Everywhere she went at the Case Farms plant, there were dozens of workers crowded into a small space. In the locker room, where everyone put on their uniforms. On the cutting line, where she spent eight hours slicing chicken breasts. In the cafeteria during lunch. Even at break time, when workers lined up to use the bathroom.

“I tried to bring my own face mask that I had bought at the pharmacy, but they wouldn’t let me wear it,” said Rivas, 31. “When they wouldn’t let me wear my own mask, I went to the nurse’s station at the plant, and they said there were no masks available.” (Mike Popowycz, vice chairman of Case Farms, said it’s taking the pandemic “very seriously” and has taken several measures to protect workers.)

So Rivas said she called the state’s Department of Labor with the help of a local worker’s center.

Rivas is far from alone. Nearly 4,000 workers from across the country have gone to the federal agency that polices worker health and safety with concerns that their employers haven’t done enough to protect them from the coronavirus as of April 3, according to records obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Some 27% of the complaints to OSHA came from the health care industry, from workers on the front lines of providing COVID-19 care. Another 72% came from other types of employees, with large quantities from manufacturing and retail workers, with the remainder listed as unknown.

Even as OSHA has been inundated with COVID-19-related complaints, the agency has issued a series of guidelines that roll back safety standards and virtually eliminate non-health care workers from government protection.

That poses a serious risk to millions of essential workers, many of whom live paycheck-to-paycheck, safety advocates say. Dozens of workers, including meat cutters, supermarket greeters, airport screeners and bus drivers have died as the disease has spread.

And it raises significant questions as President Donald Trump and several governors lay out plans to reopen the economy.

“Workers are getting sick and dying, and the government agency that they have turned to for 40 years to protect them from everything from chemicals in the workplace to unguarded machines to the H1N1 pandemic has said, ‘Sorry, you’re on your own,’” said Debbie Berkowitz, a former top OSHA policy adviser now at the worker-oriented National Employment Law Project.

A spokesperson for the Department of Labor, OSHA’s parent agency, said in a statement: “Since the emergence of COVID-19, OSHA is taking swift and decisive action to protect workers in high-risk industries.” The statement continued: “OSHA has a number of tools it can use to protect workers from workplace hazards caused by COVID-19. … However, OSHA is providing enforcement discretion to help employers comply with OSHA requirements during the challenging times the pandemic has created and to help ensure that PPE [personal protective equipment] is available in workplaces — including healthcare facilities — where it is needed most.”

The government has received a raft of complaints from non-medical workers in an array of non-medical industries.

More than a dozen employees at an Intel computer chip fabrication plant in Oregon filed reports with the state worker protection agency saying they weren’t able to maintain a 6-foot distance from their co-workers. “You have to be literally 2 inches from someone’s face or body,” said Brent Macias, one of the employees who filed a complaint and developed coronavirus symptoms. A spokesperson for Intel said the company is taking steps to implement social distancing at its manufacturing sites, such as staggering shift changes and limiting activities that require close proximity.

In Florida, 35 fast food workers at the Orlando airport filed a complaint with the federal OSHA claiming that their employer, HMSHost, sometimes failed to offer hot water to wash their hands and provided them with little protective gear. “They were not helping us,” said Maria Gonzalez, a cashier who made $11.21 an hour before being furloughed in late March. “They were not doing anything — no training, no gloves, no masks, no hand sanitizer — pretty much nothing to protect us.” At least one HMSHost employee at the airport has tested positive for COVID-19, according to a union organizer who spoke with the ill worker. (Spokeswoman Sheila Bliss said HMSHost has implemented protective and safety measures that go beyond recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Our associates and travelers remain our greatest concern and we will take all recommended measures to protect them,” she said.)

Over the past two weeks, OSHA and the CDC have issued a series of guidelines and directives that have weakened protections for front-line workers outside the medical field. For example, the CDC released guidance on April 8 that critical workers who’d been exposed to the coronavirus could return to work as long as they don’t have any symptoms and wear a mask. The guidance came despite comments just three days earlier from the government’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, that 25% to 50% of the people with the virus may be asymptomatic. (Everyone else who has been exposed is advised to self-quarantine for 14 days.)

This was followed by directives from OSHA. Last Friday, the agency announced that it would not require employers outside health care, emergency response or corrections to investigate whether COVID-19 cases among employees are work-related unless multiple people in the same vicinity get sick.

Then on Monday, OSHA issued an enforcement directive detailing its approach to handling COVID-19 complaints. Medical workers, who have been heavily affected by the virus, have been prioritized. At least 88 U.S. health care workers have died from COVID-19, according to an unofficial list kept by the website Medscape.

But OSHA said it would not formally handle any complaints about the coronavirus from other essential workers. Instead, the agency will send a letter to the employer, which then has five business days to notify the agency about how it has addressed the complaint. The memo notes that these complaints “will not normally result in an on-site inspection.” The agency said it would “consider” an inspection if it believes the response is inadequate.

“It totally excludes everybody but health care,” said David Michaels, former OSHA director in the Obama administration. “Everyone else is told that there is nothing that OSHA could do.”

But Ed Foulke, who oversaw OSHA from 2006 to 2008, said the agency is correct to establish priorities when there are limited resources and inspectors are working from home. “This is an unprecedented event and the reasonable approach is to say, ‘Where is the greatest need?’” he said.

“OSHA clearly cares” about non-medical workers, Foulke said. “An inspector can’t be sent out for every complaint. You can’t do it. You have to be realistic.”

Still, the Trump administration’s approach differs from how other infectious diseases have been handled in the past, from the hepatitis B outbreak in hospitals and the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s to H1N1 and the Ebola virus in more recent years, according to longtime industry professionals. In each of those cases, OSHA issued more forceful enforcement guidance and carried a stronger public presence. Now, the agency isn’t even on the White House Coronavirus Task Force.

For example, during the H1N1 flu pandemic in 2009, OSHA took additional steps to safeguard worker health, including issuing a directive that required employers to abide by CDC guidance. By contrast, OSHA’s COVID-19 memo states that inspectors should consult CDC guidance and grants them latitude to use discretion even when an employer’s measures are not as protective as what the CDC recommends.

In addition, during H1N1, OSHA laid out specific scenarios that could result in violations under the general duty standard, detailing the nitty-gritty of sneeze guards and the setup of “airborne infection isolation rooms.” Today, the Trump administration provides no such guidance for inspectors; in fact, it emphasizes the high legal bar for inspectors to cite employers under the standard.

“It’s written to make it much more difficult to issue citations,” Michaels said. “It gives the employers certain outs as to why they’re not following CDC guidelines.”

There have been no inspections resulting from COVID-19 complaints, said one OSHA employee — at least not in the OSHA region the employee works in. The OSHA staffer added that the agency could be more proactive in its response to these complaints. “It seems a lot of it is providing workers with information but not trying to address the particular issues people are raising,” the employee said. “We should be more forceful and direct in our interactions with the employer.” The OSHA employee asked to remain anonymous because the worker is not authorized to speak with reporters.

OSHA is limited in how it can respond because it doesn’t have a regulation it can enforce that’s directly related to airborne infectious diseases. (OSHA notes that there are eight regulations that may apply to coronavirus, including provisions related to hand-washing, personal protective equipment and an employer’s general duty to provide a safe workplace.)

But there are ways OSHA could have been more active, former agency officials and worker advocates say.

For example, an infectious disease standard was being drafted, but was never completed, during the Obama administration. It was shelved when Trump took office, according to federal rule-making documents.

In late January, as the coronavirus was spreading in China and beginning to arrive in the United States, Democratic congressional aides met with Department of Labor staff to urge them to issue a compliance directive and temporary emergency standard to protect health care workers.

Such a standard could easily be adapted to confront COVID-19, but Labor Department leaders questioned the need, a congressional aide who was at the meeting said. “There wasn’t a whole lot of consciousness about what was going to be coming down the line,” the aide said. “I think they weren’t taking the disease seriously and they certainly weren’t interested in enforcing.”

As COVID-19 cases began to multiply in early March, unions petitioned Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia, requesting an emergency standard for health workers. And House Democrats began drafting language to insert into a coronavirus response bill that was rapidly working its way through Congress. The legislation would have required health care employers to implement an infectious disease exposure control plan. But the American Hospital Association said the provision would be “impossible to implement” because of the shortage of N95 respirator masks and would dramatically reduce the number of patients hospitals could treat. Congress stripped it from the bill.

Meanwhile, as America’s health care system began raising red flags about the shortage of safety gear, OSHA started issuing the first of several directives, rolling back standards intended to protect doctors and nurses. In mid-March, the agency suspended annual fit testing for N95 masks in an effort to conserve equipment.

As recorded cases reached the thousands, it issued a packet of tips for employers but emphasized that its recommendations were not enforceable.

In early April, as the supply shortage became ever more critical, OSHA relaxed other rules, allowing for the extended use and reuse of N95s and for respirators certified in other countries.

“Some of these, you are dealing with a crisis situation, they are moving to address the lack of equipment,” said Peg Seminario, former health and safety director of the AFL-CIO. “But every one of these is rolling back existing protections and requirements. It’s not putting out something new or more.”

The agency has been diminished in resources and leadership under the Trump administration, and former OSHA officials say that has dulled the agency’s response to COVID-19. “Their ability to deal with this virus is made even weaker by a lack of resources because the Trump administration has shrunk the agency to the point that they have no ability to respond,” said Berkowitz.

At the start of the year, OSHA had 862 federal inspectors, the lowest number in the agency’s history, according to data NELP obtained from the agency.

With OSHA playing a passive role, some governors have issued their own worker-safety mandates. On Sunday, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued an executive order requiring employers to provide essential workers with masks to wear when they interact with the public. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy went further, ordering retail businesses to cut their maximum occupancy in half and install barriers between workers and customers.

Twenty-two states run their own occupational health and safety agencies for public and private workers, with federal approval, which are required to match or exceed federal regulations and directives. Some of them appear to be taking a more aggressive approach. In Oregon, where there have been nearly 2,800 COVID-19-related complaints to date, about a dozen inspections have been conducted across a variety of industries. The state agency is also conducting “spot checks” to ensure that employers who received and sent letters in response to a complaint are following through.

But a patchwork approach to keeping workers safe might not bode well for the plans to reopen businesses. In recent days, many of the largest outbreaks have been at work, highlighted by the spread of the disease to more than 600 workers at Smithfield Foods’ pork processing plant in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

That could raise the prospect of the disease reigniting if more precautions aren’t taken, according to public health experts. “Until there’s a real discussion about how workers beyond hospitals are going to be protected,” Michaels said, “I don’t see how we can be talking about bringing workers back.”

And that discussion could mean a lot for workers like Gregoria Rivas.

In North Carolina, Rivas said she received little help from the state’s OSHA when she called to voice her concerns around the possible spread of COVID-19 at Case Farms. On the other end of the phone line, Rivas said, an inspector took down her complaint but told her there wasn’t much the agency could do because it doesn’t have specific regulations for infectious diseases. The agency had made recommendations to businesses, but it had no power to enforce them, the inspector said.

(Natalie Bouchard of North Carolina’s Department of Labor said the agency investigates every complaint. In a statement, she confirmed the state has no occupational safety standard concerning COVID-19 but added that “it is the employer’s duty to provide each employee with a ‘place of employment free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious injury or serious physical harm to his employees.’”)

Discouraged by the response, Rivas, who has a 2-year-old son and 8-year-old daughter, decided to quit rather than risk infection. “I thought I was going to receive some answers that would reassure me,” she said. “But from what I understood, it didn’t matter what was happening, whether it’s a pandemic or not, the plant was going to continue working as normal.”

Do you have access to information about how the government is protecting — or not protecting — essential workers from the coronavirus that should be public? Email bernice.yeung@propublica.org.

Here’s how to send tips and documents to ProPublica securely.

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.