Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
After nearly two decades of paralysis on the issue, Mississippi officials are inching closer to establishing a state home mitigation program to protect residents from natural disasters. Storm preparation experts say such a program is vital to building resilience as the dangers from climate change continue to grow.
Senate Bill 2409, which would create the Strengthen Mississippi Homes Program, heads to Gov. Tate Reeves for his consideration after both chambers approved the measure on Wednesday.
In a three-part series last year, Mississippi Today reported on the immense vulnerability the state faces to climate change, which some researchers argued is greater than anywhere else in the country.
The program would offer grants of up to $10,000 to allow homeowners to retrofit their property to better protect them from hurricane, tornado, hail and other windstorm damage. The money would go towards upgrading roofs to meet the FORTIFIED standards set by the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety.
Alabama, which leads the nation in FORTIFIED homes, released a study last year showing a significant reduction in losses from mitigated houses versus others after Hurricane Sally in 2020. In addition to making homes safer, the grant has also helped reduce home insurance costs. Since Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Mississippians, especially on the Coast, have seen skyrocketing premiums as insurance companies account for the risk of natural disasters.
Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney speaks during the Mississippi Economic Council’s annual Hobnob at the Mississippi Coliseum in Jackson on Thursday, Oct. 30, 2025. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today
“I would like to thank the (lawmakers) for their work in coming together on a mitigation program that puts us on a level playing field with other coastal states that have successful mitigation programs such as Alabama and Louisiana,” state Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney said in a statement Wednesday, adding that his office is committed to “improve long-term resilience for Mississippi homeowners.”
Single-family, primary residence homes anywhere in Mississippi would be eligible for the grants. The home must have windstorm insurance and, if in a flood zone, flood insurance as well. The Mississippi Department of Insurance, which would administer the program, would fund the grants through fees collected from insurance agents. The department’s appropriation bill, which is being considered by the governor, allows them to spend up to $15 million for the program from the fees collected.
State officials first developed the program in 2007 in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. But due to a lack of political will and infighting among state officials, it took until 2024 for the Legislature to fund the program. That approval was limited to a pilot program, though, and lawmakers declined to re-up the funding in 2025.
A main point of contention was whether to allow the Insurance Department to run the program or to put it in the hands of a separate, nonprofit authority. The distrust between lawmakers and Chaney traced back to a 2016 scandal over funding the state couldn’t account for, which went through a different state agency, Mississippi Today reported.
Yet while arguing the Insurance Department shouldn’t run the program, lawmakers also pointed to Alabama’s mitigation program as a shining example. Alabama runs its program through its state insurance department, and experts, such as those at Smart Home America and Habitat for Humanity of the Mississippi Gulf Coast, said the program largely mirrored what Chaney pushed for.
Sen. Scott DeLano, R-Gulfport, listens as questions are asked during a Senate Education Committee meeting on Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, at the Capitol in Jackson. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today
Sen. Scott DeLano, a Republican from Biloxi who’s led the Legislature’s work on the issue, repeatedly called out Chaney last year over a lack of information and concerns with the Insurance Department running the grant fund. Leading up to this legislative session, though, the two were able to work through their differences, DeLano said.
“I’ve got to commend the commissioner for the work he’s done,” the senator told his colleagues on the floor Wednesday.
Sen. Walter Michel, a Republican from Ridgeland, introduced the measure.
“For too, too long we have played hurricane roulette with the mitigation work,” Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann said after the Senate passed the proposal. “So many homes all across Mississippi will need what you did today.”
The proposal would also create an advisory committee that would meet with the Insurance Department about the program three times a year. The committee would be comprised of three appointees from the Senate, three from the House, and the executive director of the Mississippi Windstorm Underwriters Association.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
For the first time in years, state leaders have voted to increase the amount of tax credits available to Mississippians who donate to private schools.
The Children’s Promise Act program currently allows people to claim up to $18 million in tax credits in total. Under a bill headed to the governor, that state would instead allow people to claim up to $24 million in tax credits starting in 2027.
Since 2020, private schools and foster care organizations have been receiving money through the Children’s Promise Act, which gives donors dollar-for-dollar tax credits for up to 50% of the donor’s state tax liability.
House Ways and Means Chairman Trey Lamar, a Republican from Senatobia, originally touted the program as a way to give money to nonprofit organizations that care for foster children, but a provision to give tax credits to private-school donors was tucked into the bill when it was passed in 2019.
House Bill 1944, which passed the House and Senate this week, would change the buckets of money available to different organizations, giving private-school donors access to more tax credits.
Under current law, half of the program’s tax credits, up to $9 million, are earmarked for people and organizations that donate to foster care service organizations. The other $9 million in tax credits are available to donors to private or special purpose schools that have any students in the foster care system, students with chronic illnesses or disabilities or students who are eligible for free or reduced-price meals.
But if Gov. Tate Reeves signs HB 1944, one of the $9 million buckets would be entirely available to private-school donors because the legislation separates the schools in the second category and gives special purpose schools access to a new pot of tax credits up to $6 million.
That means next year, nonprofit foster care organizations would be eligible for $9 million, private schools would be eligible for $9 million and special purpose schools would be eligible for $6 million.
Though Lamar’s attempt to substantially increase the cap on the program failed this year — as it has in previous years — this is the first time money has been added to the program since 2022, in large part to advocates who have rallied against the program. Opponents say the program is an indirect way for the state to funnel tax dollars to private schools.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
People who distribute, or intend to distribute, abortion-inducing medication in Mississippi could face a criminal charge and up to 10 years in prison if convicted, under a bill lawmakers are sending to Republican Gov. Tate Reeves.
Experts say criminalization could lock up desperate Mississippians and scare doctors away from prescribing these medications in clinical settings for non-abortion purposes, such as stopping postpartum hemorrhaging and easing symptoms of miscarriages.
Lawmakers added restrictions on abortion-inducing drugs to a drug trafficking bill that passed the House 76-38 and the Senate 37-15 on Tuesday. Republicans control both chambers.
“I think we’re going to end up trapping a lot of people into the criminal justice system simply because they want to have autonomy over their own bodies,” said Rep. Zakiya Summers, a Democrat from Jackson, who voted against the bill.
Rep. Celeste Hurst, a Republican from Sandhill, said she introduced this amendment to keep abortion medication, such as mifepristone and misoprostol, from entering Mississippi.
“The intent is to keep doctors from out of state from circumventing our current law,” Hurst told Mississippi Today.
But there is virtually no way for Mississippi to prosecute providers who send abortion pills across state lines, according to Mary Ziegler, an expert on abortion law and a professor at University of California at Davis School of Law. Shield laws in states where abortion is legal protect abortion providers, patients and helpers from out-of-state investigations, lawsuits and prosecutions, Ziegler told Mississippi Today.
“I think lawmakers are imagining this will be primarily used against doctors or drug manufacturers in blue states,” Ziegler said. “But it will be much harder for prosecutors to actually get those people into court than it will be for them to get someone whose partner has these drugs.”
What makes the legislation especially harmful, Ziegler said, is its vagueness. The bill says possession would only be criminal if there were an intent to distribute, but Ziegler expects Mississippians using the drugs for their own purposes could be prosecuted.
Language around clinical settings is also vague. The bill says Mississippi providers would only be prosecuted if they prescribed abortion-inducing medication with the intent to cause an abortion, not in instances where those drugs are prescribed to aid in a miscarriage or stop hemorrhaging. Despite this exemption, the bill is sure to have a chilling effect on health care, Ziegler said.
In both cases, Ziegler said, “the differentiator is intent, which is really, really hard to prove.”
This kind of legislation primarily comes down to the fact that abortion opponents are disappointed that abortions have increased in recent years, Ziegler said.
In 2022, the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, in a Mississippi case, overturned the constitutional protections around the right to abortion. At the time, it was considered a huge victory for the anti-abortion movement. But abortions have paradoxically increased across the nation in the years since then, largely due to increased access to mail-in abortion medication.
“That’s kind of a hollow thing for the state if that happens and then the number of abortions doesn’t go down,” Ziegler said. “It’s like, what did you really accomplish?”
Sen. Daniel Sparks, a Republican from Belmont and one of six lawmakers who hashed out the final details of the legislation, told Mississippi Today he supported the amendment as a way to enforce Mississippi’s abortion ban.
“The state of Mississippi has been pretty clear of where they are about their pro-life position,” Sparks said. “If people are circumventing that through the mail or through other mechanisms, then I think we’re trying to be consistent with what the law is.”
Sen. Bradford Blackmon, a Democrat from Canton who voted against the bill, said it’s “outrageous,” “ridiculous” and “unnecessary” to lump abortion medication in with scheduled drugs and allow the state to enforce imprisonment of one to 10 years for the offense. In the end, Blackmon said, it’s just going to hurt poor women.
“The wealthy Mississippians are still going to be able to go where they want to get abortions,” Blackmon said.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
Retired Circuit Judge Bob Helfrich died Tuesday. He was 72.
Helfrich was known best for his role prosecuting Sam Bowers, the imperial wizard for the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, in the 1966 killing of NAACP leader Vernon Dahmer Sr. in Hattiesburg.
The White Knights was the most violent white supremacist organization in the 1960s.
Before Bowers went to trial in 1998, Helfrich told reporters, ‘‘Justice was never served the first time. It’s time justice was done.’’
The first trial had led to a few convictions, but the klansmen didn’t stay behind bars long because governors pardoned them, commuted their sentences or released them early. Most of the killers walked free, including Bowers.
Thirty-two years after the fact, Bowers went on trial for ordering the killing of Dahmer, who died after defending his family from klansmen who fired into the family home and set it on fire.
Dennis Dahmer was 12 years old when the attack took place on Jan. 10, 1966. That same year, Helfrich watched his dad die from lung cancer. He, too, was 12.
“That’s why I feel close to the Dahmer family,” Helfrich said then. “I was there when my dad died, there till his last breath.”
Days before the August 1998 trial began, his voice broke with emotion as he spoke about the family. “I cannot imagine the thoughts that go through their minds,” he said.
Dennis Dahmer described his relationship with Helfrich as a close one. “We both talked about our shared experience of losing our fathers during adolescence,” he said.
In his closing statement, defense lawyer Travis Buckley claimed that Bowers was being persecuted, comparing it to Adolf Hitler’s propaganda campaign against Jews.
Helfrich told jurors that Bowers ordered klansmen to kill Dahmer, just like Hitler ordered his henchmen to kill millions of Jews. “Did Hitler do it? No. Was Hitler responsible? Yes. And what do we have here?” Helfrich said as he pointed at Bowers. “Let’s talk about Hitler. Let’s talk about an evil genius sitting right there.”
A jury convicted Bowers, and the judge sentenced him to life in prison, where he died in 2006.
“The Dahmer family will always be grateful for the decision made by District Attorney Lindsay Carter and then-prosecutor Bob Helfrich to reopen the civil rights murder case of Vernon F. Dahmer Sr.,” Dennis Dahmer said.
Yes, he said, it was “a risky political decision to make, but it was the right thing to do. Justice delayed is better than justice denied!”
Five years after that conviction, Helfrich was sworn in as a circuit judge. Dahmer’s daughter, Bettie, declared, “It’s a new day for justice in Forrest and Perry County.”
Helfrich became one of the first group of judges to utilize drug courts in Mississippi. Those courts make it possible for those battling drug problems to reverse convictions after completing a recovery program.
In 2006, he threw out the burglary conviction of Black Korean War veteran Clyde Kennard, who was railroaded in 1960 after he tried to enroll at the then-all-white college now known as the University of Southern Mississippi.
Kennard was sentenced to seven years in prison and was released in 1963 after officials at Parchman prison discovered he was dying of cancer. The lone witness recanted his testimony, saying Kennard had done nothing wrong.
“Because this matter did begin here, it should end here,” Helfrich said. “This is not a black and white issue; it’s a right and wrong issue. To correct that wrong, I am compelled to do the right thing.”
in a statement Wednesday, Mississippi Supreme Court Chief Justice Mike Randolph said Helfrich “developed a deep commitment to drug courts, and the former participants held him in the highest regard. … He went on to lead one of the most respected drug courts in the state. Judge Helfrich was appointed multiple times by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Mississippi to serve on the State Intervention Court Advisory Council, and he assisted and counseled all of the state’s trial judges.”
Helfrich retired last year, and Gov. Tate Reeves appointed Hattiesburg attorney Thomas “Michael” Reed to take Helfrich’s place until the term expires in 2028.
Devery Anderson, author of the book “A Slow, Calculated Lynching: The Story of Clyde Kennard,” said the passion and resolve that Helfrich “mustered in prosecuting the mastermind behind the 1966 murder of Vernon Dahmer tells you everything you need to know about him.”
His exoneration of Kennard demonstrates that Helfrich “was always willing to do the right thing — let the consequence follow,” Anderson said. “He will long be revered in Mississippi law for these and a host of other reasons.”
Update 4/1/26: This story has been updated to include a statement from Mississippi chief justice, Mike Randolph.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
So much to talk about: Mo Williams to Kentucky, Mississippi State’s baseball excellence, Tiger Woods’ errant drives, Warner Alford, the Final Fours, some Saints news, and Rick’s gumbo.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
Opioid Settlement Fund Advisory council member Greg Spore was hopeful when reviewing applications last fall from organizations looking to prevent and address addiction in Mississippi.
As someone who struggled with addiction for years, Spore thought the tens of millions of lawsuit dollars the state Legislature tasked the council with overseeing could help make the resources that have helped him maintain long-term recovery. He saw some plans to do that in some of the applications he and others were reviewing.
“I’m optimistic,” he told Mississippi Today in October. “Because I think I have to be optimistic.”
“I’m really just dumbfounded,” Spore said Monday. “I’m just sort of stumped.”
It’s not that he thought the advisory council was flawless. Spore saw and spoke up against council problems when they arose — such as the body favoring applications members were associated with and high variance in the scoring of applications between different subcommittee groups. And it’s not that he isn’t happy with some of the Legislature’s proposed funding decisions.
But lawmakers went further in changing spending plans for tens of millions of opioid settlement dollars than some councilmembers like Spore thought they could. These changes included sending money to groups that had never applied through the advisory council’s application process, according to the council’s public documents.
“We were just sort of stripped of any input, any vetting we had done,” he said.
Spore is among other opioid overdose prevention advocates and people who’ve struggled with addiction across Mississippi and the country who expressed concern over the Legislature’s recent moves. They worry about lawmakers bypassing advisory council recommendations in its first opioid settlement distributions, misspending money instead of addressing addiction.
The plan lawmakers released goes against what the Mississippi state code they created last year instructs them to do — only accept or reject changes. Seven budget bills show the Legislature plans to change the recommended amounts of money each applicant receives and even some money to groups that never applied for funds.
But there are still other appropriations using money the council oversees for proposals it never reviewed. Lawmakers plan to send the Department of Employment Security $1 million for a new recovery-to-work program, and $4.5 million to community mental health centers for general care purposes. The $4.5 million appropriation is similar to what the Department of Mental Health requested in January in general funds for the organizations.
Republican Senate Judiciary A Chairman Brice Wiggins, who has been involved in this year’s opioid settlement distribution process, told Mississippi Today on Monday lawmakers had the right to make the appropriations the way it did.
“The Legislature changes laws every year and amends laws every year and does that,” the Pascagoula lawmaker said. “It’s all legal. So whatever Mississippi Today’s interpretation is, I defer to lawyers and constitutional scholars.”
Sen. Brice Wiggins, R-Pascagoula, speaks during a Senate Education Committee meeting on Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, at the Capitol in Jackson. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today
He later posted on his Facebook page thanking the advisory council for its work while saying that “stewarding these funds remains the Legislature’s responsibility.”
After reviewing the 2026 opioid settlement bill, Matt Steffey, a constitutional law professor at Mississippi College, said the new proposed language still reads like the advisory council review process is necessary for spending the national lawsuits required to be used for overdose prevention.
He said it’s hard to see how bypassing the council would follow the law’s stated goal “to ensure public involvement, accountability and transparency in allocating and accounting for the monies in the fund.”
MaryAsa Lee, spokesperson for Attorney General and Advisory Council Chair Lynn Fitch, did not respond to an emailed question about Fitch’s thoughts on lawmakers going outside the council applications in their abatement funding decisions.
The state’s Supreme Court has ruled that lawmakers control money the state wins in lawsuits, and Steffey said he didn’t know if someone would have legal standing to challenge these appropriations in court. But he said just because the Legislature may be able to do that doesn’t mean they should.
“It certainly shouldn’t set up a year-long process and then ignore it,” Steffey said. “If the Legislature sets up a process, the citizens should be able to expect the Legislature to then abide it and honor it.”
The 2026 bill requires the advisory council to contract with a consultant to improve the opioid settlement distribution process, which council member James Moore called for last year. Moore has worked to prevent overdoses throughout Mississippi since his son fatally overdosed 11 years ago.
James Moore, a member of the Mississippi Opioid Settlement Fund Advisory Council, listens to questions during a meeting at the Carroll Gartin Justice Building in Jackson, Monday, Nov. 3, 2025. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today
Seeing how the Legislature considered the council’s work, Moore worries whether a consulting group’s work would be treated similarly.
“Would those same legislators have any motivation to accept the recommendations from an out-of-state agency skilled in grant application reviews?” He asked in an email to Mississippi Today.
Tricia Christensen, an independent drug policy consultant in Tennessee, said the Legislature could further shut out Mississippians with the most expertise in how best to prevent more overdoses. Mississippi is one of the few states where there are no opportunities for people without political connections to offer public testimony.
“If the Legislature holds all the power, there will be even less ability for community members and subject matter experts to apply for or help influence how funds are spent,” Christensen said in a text message to Mississippi Today.
Lawmakers in other states have also sought to supersede opioid settlement advisory councils. Regina LaBelle, the country’s former top drug policy official and the director of Georgetown Law’s Center on Addiction and Public Policy, said it could be tempting to soon use legislative power to backfill impending Medicaid funding cuts and other federal health addiction grants.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
Two bills that would have allowed lawmakers to make Mississippi’s state Supreme Court districts fairer for Black voters died with a Monday night deadline, likely guaranteeing a federal judge will redraw the maps.
While the House and Senate could not reach agreement on redrawing the three court districts, lawmakers on Tuesday debated and passed numerous other bills, hoping to end their 2026 regular session by Thursday. On Monday night, legislators had finished crafting a nearly $7.4-billion state budget for the fiscal year that begins July 1.
The legislative wrangling over the state’s high court districts stems from U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock’s ruling last year that the districts in the northern, central and southern parts of the state violate the federal Voting Rights Act because they do not allow Black voters in one area a fair chance to elect a candidate of their choice.
Sen. Brice Wiggins, R-Pascagoula, speaks in the Senate chamber on Thursday, April 11, 2024, at the Mississippi Capitol in Jackson. Credit: AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis
Senate Judiciary A Chairman Brice Wiggins, a Republican from Pascagoula, said he believes that pending appeals related to the litigation and other court decisions involving redistricting played a role in the Legislature not redrawing the districts.
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Mississippi, the Southern Poverty Law Center and private law firms on behalf of a group of Black Mississippians filed a lawsuit under the Voting Rights Act against the state over the Supreme Court districts.
Judge Aycock in Mississippi ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, but the state defendants asked the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn her decision. The state did not ask Aycock to pause lower-court proceedings while the appeal played out.
Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Leslie King Credit: MSSC
The 5th Circuit, however, did pause its appellate proceedings until the U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision in a Louisiana case that many expect will gut much of the federal Voting Rights Act, and allow states more free rein in redistricting.
If Mississippi lawmakers redraw the Mississippi Supreme Court districts, it would be the first time lawmakers have redrawn them since 1987.
Current state law establishes three distinct Supreme Court districts, commonly referred to as the Northern, Central and Southern districts. Voters elect three judges from each of these districts to make up the nine-member court.
The main district at issue in the case is the Central District, which comprises many parts of the majority-Black Delta and the majority-Black Jackson Metro area. Currently, two white justices, Kenny Griffis and Jenifer Branning, and one Black justice, Leslie King, represent the district.
No Black person has ever been elected to the Mississippi Supreme Court, in the state with the highest percentage of Black residents, without first obtaining an interim appointment from the governor, and no Black person from either of the two other districts has ever served on the state’s high court.
Jarvis Dortch, executive director of the ACLU of Mississippi, told Mississippi Today in a statement that since a federal judge concluded that Supreme Court districts are shaped in a way that prevents Black voters from having a chance to elect a candidate of their choice, he is disappointed lawmakers chose not to remedy the map.
“The federal court gave the Mississippi Legislature an opportunity to correct those discriminatory districts,” Dortch said. “Lawmakers chose not to. Their inaction is further evidence that this country still needs the protections of the Voting Rights Act.”
Aycock, in a December order, wrote that if the Legislature ends its session without adopting a new map, attorneys are required to provide a formal notice to her within seven days after the end of the session. After receiving notice, she will meet with attorneys to discuss the next steps in the litigation.
The 2026 legislative session, now set to draw to a close, has seen much infighting between Republican House and Senate leaders, and each chamber has killed many of the other’s major proposals. Some highlights from Tuesday’s deliberations:
Bills increasing state role in immigration sent to governor
Both chambers approved the negotiated version of bills on Tuesday that would increase Mississippi’s role in enforcing federal immigration law and force local law enforcement agencies to assist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Rep. Zakiya Summers, D-Jackson, scans the House floor on the first day of the 2026 regular session, Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2026, at the Mississippi Capitol in Jackson, Miss. Credit: Richard Lake/Mississippi Today
Republican lawmakers voted in near party-line votes to send SB 2114 and HB 538 to Republican Gov. Tate Reeves for his consideration. Republicans said the bills would enhance public safety and hold people accountable for violating immigration laws, while Democrats raised concerns that the federal government is responsible for enforcement and that the proposals would leave counties on the hook for paying to incarcerate undocumented immigrants.
“We didn’t have enough money for infrastructure, we didn’t have enough money for childcare, but clearly we have enough money to hold people in jail or in prison because we are so concerned about so-called illegal aliens committing crimes in the state of Mississippi,” said Rep. Zakiya Summers, a Democrat from Jackson.
SB 2114 makes it a state misdemeanor to enter Mississippi from another country outside a legal port of entry, creating a minimum penalty of six months in prison. Illegal immigration is already a federal crime, but this measure also would make it a state-level crime in Mississippi.
Under the measure, if undocumented people are also convicted of other crimes, they would have a minimum of two additional years added to their sentence. Rep. Joey Hood, a Republican from Ackerman, said the provision is necessary to deter undocumented people from committing crimes against Mississippians.
Rep. Joey Hood, R-Ackerman, left, answers a question from Rep. John Faulkner, D-Holly Springs, at the Mississippi Capitol in Jackson, Thursday, March 3, 2022. Credit: AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis
Other provisions in the legislation include letting the Department of Public Safety collect data on undocumented immigrants living in Mississippi and directing state and local law enforcement agencies to enter into agreements with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement to carry out immigration raids. The state attorney general’s office could investigate agencies accused of failing to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.
HB 538 would ban “sanctuary” policies across Mississippi by preventing any state entities from adopting policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. It would also require these entities to share information about individuals’ immigration status and to honor ICE detainer requests. It gives the state attorney general’s office the authority to investigate and sue agencies or officials who don’t comply with the measure.
Last-minute negotiations on education policies
Though lawmakers appeared to reach an agreement on a teacher pay raise earlier this week, the legislation was sent for further negotiation Tuesday and changed to include a provision similar to the bill’s original language about school counselors.
Sen. Angela Burks Hill, R-Picayune, listens during a Senate Education Committee meeting on Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, at the Capitol in Jackson. Credit: Eric Shelton/Mississippi Today
Amid the teacher pay raise debate, the original language in SB 2103 was stripped. The bill, authored by Republican Sen. Angela Burks Hill of Picayune, would have removed the requirement that Mississippi school counselors follow the American School Counselor Association’s code of ethics.
The amendment added Tuesday would allow the Mississippi Department of Education to come up with an ethics policy for Mississippi school counselors to follow, according to Senate Education Chairman Dennis DeBar, a Republican from Leakesville.
“We trust the department to make good, sound judgment when they do so,” he said.
Hill said there’s “no reason” that the state’s counselors should be required to commit to a national code of ethics from what she described as a “social justice activist organization.” The group represents about 43,000 school counselors, and focuses on providing professional development and supporting counselors, according to the organization’s website.
Hill said her concerns are rooted in keeping parents in-the-know about their children.
“Some of the platforms that the ASCA has are basically affirmation of gender confusion and fluidity, and they have a balance between students’ rights and parental rights,” she said. “So that’s a concern because if that’s going on, a parent needs to know it.”
While the latest version of the bill does not appear to require counselors to tell parents about changes with their students, policies in other states that require schools to notify parents if their children change their gender identification or pronouns have come under fire and brought litigation.
Both chambers filed the new version of the bill on Tuesday and a full vote is pending.
Winter Storm Fern bills passed
The Legislature has passed two bills on to the governor that would help fund recovery from Winter Storm Fern.
Frozen trees and power lines cover a road near Yellow Creek Port in Iuka on Jan. 25, 2026, following Winter Storm Fern. Credit: Courtesy, Emily Hayes-White
Both chambers adopted SB 3104, which would give various agencies over $122 million from the state’s Capital Expense Fund. The largest appropriation provides $20 million for the Mississippi Emergency Management Agency for disaster recovery, including Winter Storm Fern.
On Sunday, lawmakers passed SB 3229 to allow the state to borrow money to help Entergy defray the cost of repairs to its power system from the storm. The storm is estimated to have caused over $200 million in damages to Mississippi’s largest energy provider.
Legislators have said that the state is able to borrow money at a lower rate than Entergy would, and that by loaning the money to Entergy they can help prevent large rate hikes for customers to repair damages. The bill is similar to one that was passed for Mississippi Power Company after Hurricane Katrina caused widespread damage to its system in 2005.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
More than a dozen school districts have to address problems ranging from poor recordkeeping and significant debt to dysfunctional leadership — issues that might otherwise fly under the radar of local communities until they become too severe to ignore.
The districts each have a downgraded accreditation status, and they must act on plans to resolve the violations state education officials cited. The state Board of Education approved those corrective action plans earlier this month.
Most of the district’s violations stem from late financial audits, poor recordkeeping and fiscal mismanagement. Some districts, including Hazlehurst, North Bolivar and Jackson Public Schools, have been on probation for nearly a decade for failing to clear accreditation violations.
School District Corrective Action Plans
Mississippi Department of Education findings
Corrective Action Plan status
CAP Accepted
CAP Denied
Loading district boundaries…
Two of the districts, North Bolivar and Hazlehurst, face a possible state takeover or an unannounced investigative audit of all district records if they can’t clear accreditation violations by the end of the year. State department officials found that the districts didn’t make meaningful progress toward clearing outstanding violations.
The Mississippi Department of Education will monitor the other 12 districts on probation for compliance with agency policies as well as state and federal law.
Education Department officials have been dissatisfied with the districts’ progress toward ensuring student safety, complying with federal civil rights law, complying with graduation requirements outlined in state law and record management, among other findings.
Regulators also took issue with past dysfunctional leadership in Hazlehurst, North Bolivar and Jackson Public Schools. In 2025, the agency took issue with governance violations by Greenwood-Leflore Consolidated School District, where board members hired a superintendent without properly advertising the position. Agency inspectors also noted testing irregularities at Moorhead Central School and A.W. James Elementary, two schools in the Sunflower County Consolidated School District based out of Indianola.
The school board of the North Bolivar Consolidated School District met at I.T. Montgomery Elementary School in Mound Bayou on March 23, 2026. Credit: Leonardo Bevilacqua/Mississippi Today
The agency has also received confidential complaints from JPS teachers and administrators accusing school board members of getting involved in the district’s day-to-day operations, including student discipline. An inspection of Hazlehurst’s board found that board policies weren’t regularly reviewed, with inconsistencies in student handbooks regarding promotion and retention of students.
Other findings can sometimes be bellwethers for future state takeovers.
The accreditation status for Okolona Separate School District, which the state took over in November, has been probation for two years over the past decade because of poorly run special education and gifted programs. Officials cited Wilkinson County School District, which the state took over in January, for violations stemming from unlicensed teachers and poor school board governance in six years over the past 10 prior to its 2025 takeover because of students’ persistent low performance on state tests.
North Bolivar alternative school students get shorted on instructional time
Besides citations for poor recordkeeping, not tracking staffs’ work hours and fiscal management, the Education Department also cited North Bolivar schools over the quality of its alternative school.
An inspector from the Education Department noted that a paraprofessional, and not a licensed teacher, was supervising an alternative school class in 2024. The class met in a room of Northside High that includes a kitchen, which district officials implied was not conducive to learning. State department officials found that no instruction had transpired during one visit and during another, students received 10 minutes or less of instruction.
State department inspectors couldn’t find progress reports for some alternative school students. Disciplinary histories and other documents that track student behavior were missing from files, too. Inspectors also could not locate documentation that outlined due process hearings for students.
North Bolivar Consolidated School District enrolls students from Mound Bayou, Shelby, Duncan and surrounding communities. None of those communities have more than 2,000 residents. They all lost at least a tenth of their population in the last decade. It’s hard to recruit enough teachers to fully staff every department, Superintendent Jeremiah Burks said. It’s particularly difficult to recruit teachers for the alternative school, he said.
I.T. Montgomery Elementary School in Mound Bayou is pictured on March 23, 2026. The North Bolivar Consolidated School District is one of 14 districts on probation because of accreditation violations. Credit: Leonardo Bevilacqua/Mississippi Today
Burks is pushing for a contract with Grade Results, a company that sells online courses.
Burks said he plans to move the alternative school to a better location in the district, one that complies with agency standards and provides adequate separation from general education students. He said he has assembled record review teams tasked with checking student records for missing reports or other documentation.
With future inspections, state officials will observe a more organized school district with significant progress made to reform its alternative school, Burks said.
“We took to heart (MDE’s) suggestions, and we have been implementing new plans,” Burks said. “I feel good about where we are with addressing the standards. It’s just a matter of putting everything together and formalizing it, so that we can review where we are.”
Greenville and Natchez-Adams school districts struggle to budget
Education Department regulators found bad budgeting in Greenville and Natchez-Adams school districts Millions of dollars were unaccounted for in district ledgers maintained by the two school districts.
With Greenville, district ledgers left out more obscure funds like the Quality School Construction Bond sinking fund, which is devoted to construction projects and requires regular payments by school districts.
Greenville owed vendors $79,737 and declared it had $869,692 more in their account than it did.
The Greenville school board hired Ilean Richards as superintendent in January 2025. Local leaders say they are optimistic about better fiscal management in subsequent years.
“The district is committed to and currently working to ensure that these deficiencies are corrected from previous years of past administrations,” district spokesperson Everett Chinn said in a statement.
Chinn did not respond to additional questions about what specific steps district leaders have taken to improve accounting practices. He also did not answer whether the district has mandated supplementary or requested technical assistance from the Education Department or another agency.
Natchez-Adams School District’s main operating fund reached an over $1.3 million deficit, according to its fiscal year 2022 audit. State law forbids school district officials from spending more resources than are available. Natchez-Adams also failed to submit its fiscal year 2024 audit within nine months of the end of the fiscal year.
In the Carroll County School District and in Natchez-Adams, a fund that set money aside for special education services had a negative balance. From fiscal year 2018-22, Carroll County struggled to balance its budget, pay down loans and correctly account for each fund’s balance. Its accounting paperwork was also missing the correct amounts for money owed.
Other districts, including North Bolivar, struggled to reconcile spending with purchasing and account for fixed assets like copiers, printers and other on-site technology in reports. Vicksburg-Warren School District, Greenwood-Leflore and East Tallahatchie had balance funds that were improperly stated.
In January, the state Department of Education’s Office of School Financial Services agreed to increase its availability to school districts that need technical assistance.
“There is such a profound lack of skilled persons to do that work,” Kym Wiggins, chief operating officer at the state Department of Education, said at a January state Board of Education meeting. “There’s a tremendous need for capable assistance, and so we’re trying to figure out here in office how we can build the infrastructure here to provide the support at the district level.”
More districts have already reached out for assistance, Wiggins said at the March board meeting.
Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story.
Mississippi Today / Voir Dire
An Interactive Investigation
Would You Survive Jury Selection in Mississippi?
In most states including Mississippi, prosecutors can remove potential jurors using peremptory strikes. A Mississippi Today investigation looked at the reasons prosecutors have given for striking Black jurors in more than 50 cases appealed between 2015 and 2025.
In 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Batson v. Kentucky that peremptory strikes cannot be used to remove jurors on the basis of race. Mississippi Today’s analysis of court records found that the state Supreme Court has not once ruled in favor of protecting a struck Black juror since 2015, while affirming protections for white jurors in at least four cases.
Take a seat. The prosecutor has some questions for you.
Before We Begin
What county do you live in?
Some questions the prosecutor asks will reference your county.
Between 2015 and 2025, the Mississippi Supreme Court considered at least 18 Batson claims. It ruled in favor of protecting a struck Black juror zero times.
In the same period, the court affirmed protections for struck white jurors in at least four cases.
During our investigation, Mississippi Today looked at the reasons prosecutors have given for striking Black jurors in more than 50 cases appealed between 2015 and 2025 — from their education level to their job history, their experiences with law enforcement, thoughts on the death penalty, having a family member in prison or simply giving the prosecutor a “bad vibe.”
Between 2015 and 2025, the Mississippi Supreme Court considered at least 18 Batson claims. It ruled in favor of protecting a struck Black juror zero times. In the same period, the court affirmed protections for struck white jurors in at least four cases.
const QUESTIONS = [
{
"category": "Death Penalty",
"question": "What is your opinion on the death penalty?",
"answer_options": [
"Support it",
"No Opinion",
"Oppose it"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "No Opinion",
"reason_given": "Undecided on the death penalty",
"response_text": "In Cox v. State, a capital case, a juror who wrote that she had "no opinion" on the death penalty was struck by the prosecution.",
"case_name": "Cox v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2013-DP-00087-SCT (Miss. 2015)",
"quote": ""
},
{
"answer": "Oppose it",
"reason_given": "Opposed to the death penalty",
"response_text": "Expressing opposition to the death penalty has been used to strike jurors in capital cases across Mississippi. In Cox v. State, a juror who wrote that he could never consider the death penalty was removed from the pool.",
"case_name": "Cox v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2013-DP-00087-SCT (Miss. 2015)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Law Enforcement",
"question": "Have you ever had a negative interaction with law enforcement?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Had bad interactions with law enforcement",
"response_text": "In Phillips v. State, a Black woman was struck after the prosecutor said an investigator told them she had "bad interactions" with law enforcement and the DA's office. The juror herself had not been asked about this during questioning.",
"case_name": "Phillips v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2014u2013KAu201300018u2013COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": "After consulting with our investigator on the first case, he informed us that Ms. Hodo has had bad interaction[s] with our office and also with law enforcement."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Law Enforcement",
"question": "Are any of your family members in law enforcement?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Related to law enforcement",
"response_text": "In Knox v. Cain, being related to law enforcement was cited as a reason to strike a juror. This is unusual because closeness to law enforcement is typically seen as favorable to the prosecution.",
"case_name": "Knox v. Cain",
"case_citation": "No. 5:13-CV-241-KHJ (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Family History",
"question": "Do you have a family member or loved one who has been incarcerated?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Had incarcerated loved ones",
"response_text": "Having a family member who has been charged with or convicted of a crime, or incarcerated is one of the most commonly cited reasons for striking Black jurors in Mississippi, appearing in cases reviewed by Mississippi Today including Johnson v. State, Eubanks v. State and Pettus v. State.",
"case_name": "Johnson v. State; Brown v. State; Eubanks v. State; Pettus v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Family History",
"question": "Has a member of your family ever been charged with a crime by the [COUNTY] district attorney's office?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Family members prosecuted by the DA's office",
"response_text": "In Cox v. State, the prosecutor struck a juror whose family member had been prosecuted by the assistant district attorney. The prosecutor said, "I think I've sent more Footes to the penitentiary out of Union County than any other name."",
"case_name": "Cox v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2013-DP-00087-SCT (Miss. 2015)",
"quote": "I think I've sent more Footes to the penitentiary out of Union County than any other name, I think. His brother was sentenced on drug charges. We've had Zyrone and CoCo and all amounts of Footes that we've sent to the penitentiary...."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Family History",
"question": "Have you ever had contact with the [COUNTY] district attorney's office for any reason (even if no charges were ever filed)?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Had prior contact with the district attorney's office",
"response_text": "In Clark v. State, a Black male juror was struck in part because he had previously met with the district attorney regarding a shoplifting case that was ultimately not pursued. Even though no charges were filed, that prior contact with the DA's office was cited as a reason for the strike. The court accepted it as race-neutral.",
"case_name": "Clark v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2019-DP-00689-SCT (Miss. 2022)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Family History",
"question": "Do you have close friends or relatives who have been involved in the criminal justice system?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Close friends or relatives with criminal justice history",
"response_text": "In Mootye v. State, three Black jurors were struck for having close friends and relatives with criminal legal system history. One juror sparked "concern from law enforcement officers" who suggested there may be "some connection" between the juror and a recently arrested former officer.",
"case_name": "Mootye v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2016-KA-01016-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Family History",
"question": "Has a family member ever been convicted of a crime?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Family member with criminal conviction",
"response_text": "Having a relative with a criminal conviction has been used repeatedly to strike Black jurors. In both Pitchford v. Cain and Johnson v. State, a juror was struck in part because a family member had been convicted of a crime. In the case of the latter, the juror "did not feel his nephew had been treated fairly".",
"case_name": "Johnson v. State; Pitchford v. Cain; Eubanks v. State; Brown v. State; Wilson v. State; Knox v. Cain",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Employment",
"question": "Are you currently unemployed?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Unemployed",
"response_text": "In Larry v. State, two Black jurors were struck in part because they were unemployed. Unemployment was cited alongside low education level as the reason for the strikes.",
"case_name": "Larry v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2014-KA-00201-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Employment",
"question": "Do you work in information technology (I.T.)?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Worked in I.T.",
"response_text": "In Bell v. State, a Black male juror was struck because he worked in I.T. The prosecutor told the court, "I.T. people aren't very perceptive to me."",
"case_name": "Bell v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2017-KA-01280-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": "I employed a bunch of I.T. guys at one time. I.T. people aren't very perceptive to me. I feel u2014 and some of your high-level engineers and I.T. guys, they u2014 they require a lot of data that u2014 that they just don't get in trials, and they u2014 and they fail to apply common sense to many of the instructions. That's been my experience."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Employment",
"question": "Do you work for the government or a federal agency?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Government or federal employment",
"response_text": "In Miles v. State, a juror was struck because he worked for a U.S. government agency. Employment type is listed by the Mississippi Supreme Court as a valid race-neutral reason for a peremptory strike.",
"case_name": "Miles v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2019-CT-00895-SCT (Miss.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Employment",
"question": "Do you work at a school or church?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Worked at a parochial school; might be lenient",
"response_text": "In Jackson v. Crockett, a Black female juror was struck because she was a teacher at a parochial school. The prosecutor said she might be "more lenient because of her position." The trial court accepted this, adding that she "might feel sympathy for a fairly young defendant."",
"case_name": "Jackson v. Crockett",
"case_citation": "No. 3:12cv124u2013DPJu2013FKB (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": "Ms. Wilson was a teacher at a parochial school, and the prosecutor justified the strike by stating that Ms. Wilson might be more lenient because of her position."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Employment",
"question": "Have you ever worked at a jail, prison, or correctional facility?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Had worked at a local jail",
"response_text": "In Cox v. State, a Black juror was struck because she had previously worked at a local jail, and the state argued she could have an attachment to prisoners.",
"case_name": "Cox v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2013-DP-00087-SCT (Miss. 2015)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Education",
"question": "What is the highest level of education you have completed?",
"answer_options": [
"High school diploma or less",
"Some college or associate degree",
"Bachelor's degree",
"Graduate or professional degree"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "High school diploma or less",
"reason_given": "Only had a high school degree",
"response_text": "In Larry v. State, two Black jurors were struck in part because they had only a high school education. In Young v. State, the prosecutor said he struck any juror who did not have more than a high school education because the case involved "significant DNA evidence."",
"case_name": "Larry v. State; Young v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Do you have children?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Having children",
"response_text": "In Pitchford v. Cain, the prosecutor argued that a juror with a young child who had "never married" would not be a good juror because he was "too closely related to the defendant" in life circumstances. In Clark v. State, a Black male juror was struck in part because he had a son close in age to the victim. The prosecutor argued that this similarity in circumstances could prevent the juror from remaining impartial.",
"case_name": "Pitchford v. Cain; Clark v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
},
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Have you ever been married?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "No",
"reason_given": "Never been married",
"response_text": "In Pitchford v. Cain, the prosecutor argued that an unmarried juror of similar age to the defendant would be unable to stop "thinking about these issues, especially on the second phase" of a capital trial. The juror was struck.",
"case_name": "Bell v. State; Pitchford v. Cain",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": "He has never married. [...] In my opinion he will not be able to not be thinking about these issues, especially on the second phase."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Is your spouse or partner employed in healthcare?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Spouse was a nurse",
"response_text": "In Bell v. State, a Black male juror was struck in part because his wife was a nurse. The prosecutor said, "They're not supposed to discuss the case, but that was somewhat of a flag."",
"case_name": "Bell v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2017-KA-01280-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": "His wife is also a nurse. We do not know where she is employed as a nurse. But he has to go home to her every evening, we would suspect, and we don't know what u2014 you know, they're not supposed to discuss the case, but that was somewhat of a flag."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Does anyone in your family work in the legal profession?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Family members were attorneys",
"response_text": "In Chamberlin v. Fisher, a juror was struck because her sisters were attorneys. The prosecutor told the court, "We always look at lawyers or anybody close to lawyers."",
"case_name": "Chamberlin v. Fisher",
"case_citation": "No. 2:11CV72CWR (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": "We always look at lawyers or anybody close to lawyers."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Do you own a firearm?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Owned a gun for self-protection",
"response_text": "In Dille v. State, a Black juror was struck in part because she had been car-jacked and fired a gun in self-defense. The prosecutor also struck a second Black juror, claiming she "carries a gun in a holster and has shown it to people in a threatening manner."",
"case_name": "Dille v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2019-KA-00855-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Do you drink alcohol regularly?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Known to drink",
"response_text": "In Pettus v. State, the prosecutor struck a Black juror based on information from law enforcement that the juror "was known in the community to drink a lot." Officers said they "would be surprised if she's not drinking right now."",
"case_name": "Pettus v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2018-KA-01615-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": "She struck Juror 7 based on information she received from law enforcement; namely, that Juror 7 'was known in the community to drink a lot' and that law enforcement 'would be surprised if she's not drinking right now.'"
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Have you ever struggled with substance use?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Known drug user",
"response_text": "In Pitchford v. Cain, a Black female juror was struck after the prosecutor told the court that, "according to police officers, she is a known drug user." The juror was not asked about this during voir dire.",
"case_name": "Pitchford v. Cain",
"case_citation": "No. 4:18-CV-00002-MPM (N.D. Miss.)",
"quote": "According to police officers, she is a known drug user."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Have you ever struggled with mental health issues?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Mental problems",
"response_text": "In Pitchford v. Cain, a Black female juror was struck after the prosecutor told the court that, according to a police captain, the juror "has mental problems. They have had numerous calls to her house and said she obviously has mental problems."",
"case_name": "Pitchford v. Cain",
"case_citation": "No. 4:18-CV-00002-MPM (N.D. Miss.)",
"quote": "She is the one that was 15 minutes late. She also, according to police officer, police captain, Carver Conley, has mental problems. They have had numerous calls to her house and said she obviously has mental problems."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Have you ever received a speeding ticket?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Speeding violations",
"response_text": "In Pitchford v. Cain, a Black male juror was struck in part because he had "numerous speeding violations." This was cited alongside his age, marital status, and the fact that he had a child u2014 characteristics the prosecutor said made him "too closely related to the defendant."",
"case_name": "Pitchford v. Cain",
"case_citation": "No. 4:18-CV-00002-MPM (N.D. Miss.)",
"quote": "He has numerous speeding violations that we are aware of."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Personal Life",
"question": "Have you or a family member ever been the victim of a crime?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Had been a victim of a crime",
"response_text": "In Dille v. State, a Black juror was struck in part because she had been car-jacked and fired a gun in self-defense. In Thomas v. State, a white juror was struck in part because his father had been a victim of a financial crime.",
"case_name": "Dille v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2019-KA-00855-COA (Miss. Ct. App. 2021)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Where You Live",
"question": "Do you live in an area where crime is common?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Lived in a high crime area",
"response_text": "In Payne v. State, a Black female juror was struck because she lived in Lumberton, an area where the prosecutor said they had "prosecuted several people for drugs." The Mississippi Supreme Court has listed living in a "high crime area" as a valid race-neutral reason for a strike.",
"case_name": "Payne v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2015u2013KAu201300641u2013COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": "She lives in Lumberton....We've prosecuted several people for drugs in that area."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "Do you generally feel comfortable making eye contact with people in positions of authority?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"Not really"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Not really",
"reason_given": "No eye contact with prosecutor",
"response_text": "Failing to make eye contact with the prosecutor has been cited in at least three Mississippi cases as a reason to strike Black jurors, including Sims v. State, Miskell v. State, and Pettus v. State. The Mississippi Supreme Court lists body language as a valid race-neutral reason.",
"case_name": "Sims v. State; Miskell v. State; Pettus v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "In a room full of strangers, do you tend to speak up or stay quiet?",
"answer_options": [
"Speak up",
"Stay quiet"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Stay quiet",
"reason_given": "Nonresponsive during voir dire",
"response_text": "Being nonresponsive during voir dire is one of the most commonly cited reasons for striking jurors in Mississippi. It appeared in at least five cases, including Sims v. State, Miskell v. State, and Wolfe v. State.",
"case_name": "Sims v. State; Miskell v. State; Mootye v. State; Wolfe v. State; Dille v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "Do you find it easy to sit still for long periods of time?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "No",
"reason_given": "Fidgety; would not sit still; inattentive",
"response_text": "In Miskell v. State, the prosecutor struck a Black female juror because "she was fidgety...she was inattentive. She seemed like she didn't want to be here. She was angry. Wouldn't make eye contact. Wouldn't sit still."",
"case_name": "Miskell v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2016u2013KAu201301306u2013COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": "She was fidgety when she was doing the panel. She was [in]attentive. She seemed like she didn't want to be here. She was angry. Wouldn't make eye contact. Wouldn't sit still."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "How do you feel about jury duty?",
"answer_options": [
"Happy to serve",
"It's my civic duty",
"I'd rather not be here"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "I'd rather not be here",
"reason_given": "Disinterested; did not seem to want to be there",
"response_text": "In Smith v. State (Tameka), a Black female juror was struck because she "frowned a lot during voir dire" and gave the impression she didn't want to be there. In Marshall v. State, a juror who looked like she was impatient and didn't want to be there was struck.",
"case_name": "Miskell v. State; Smith v. State (Tameka); Marshall v. State; Wolfe v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "Would people who know you say you have a serious resting face?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Frowned a lot",
"response_text": "In Smith v. State (Tameka), a Black female juror was struck because she "frowned a lot during our voir dire" and gave the impression she didn't want to be there.",
"case_name": "Smith v. State (Tameka)",
"case_citation": "No. 2015-KA-01375-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": "[I]t was our observation that she frowned a lot during our voir dire and gave us the impression that she just didn't want to be here."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "When you're in a courtroom, do you tend to feel more sympathetic toward the prosecution or the defense?",
"answer_options": [
"Prosecution",
"No preference",
"Defense"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Defense",
"reason_given": "Overly friendly to the defense",
"response_text": "In Sims v. State, a Black juror was described as "overly friendly to the defense" and "agreeable to everything the defense counsel had said" while being nonresponsive to the prosecutor. In Anderson v. State, jurors were struck for seeming to "like the defense too much."",
"case_name": "Sims v. State; Anderson v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": "The prosecutor also described [her] as behaving overly friendly to the defense and as being agreeable to everything the defense counsel had said."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "Are you generally punctual?",
"answer_options": [
"I'm always on time",
"I'm sometimes late"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "I'm sometimes late",
"reason_given": "Late to jury selection",
"response_text": "In Pitchford v. Cain, a Black female juror was struck in part because she was 15 minutes late to jury selection. Lateness was also cited in Flowers v. State.",
"case_name": "Pitchford v. Cain; Flowers v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": "S-2 is black female, juror number 30. She is the one that was 15 minutes late."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "Have you ever had trouble staying awake in school or long meetings?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Fell asleep during voir dire",
"response_text": "In Hartfield v. State, a white juror was struck because he fell asleep during defense counsel's voir dire. Notably, the trial court found this reason discriminatory. In the federal case United States v. Abreu & Young, a female juror of color was struck in part for falling asleep, which the court found valid.",
"case_name": "Hartfield v. State; United States v. Abreu & Young",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "When you fill out official forms, do you always complete every field?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"Not always"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Not always",
"reason_given": "Did not complete juror information card",
"response_text": "In Sims v. State, a Black juror was struck because she "did not complete her juror information card." Incomplete questionnaires were also cited in Pettus v. State.",
"case_name": "Sims v. State; Pettus v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Demeanor",
"question": "If given the chance, would you ask to be excused from jury duty?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Asking to be excused from jury",
"response_text": "In Knox v. Cain, asking to be excused from the jury was cited among the reasons for striking a Black juror in a capital murder case.",
"case_name": "Knox v. Cain",
"case_citation": "No. 5:13-CV-241-KHJ (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Appearance",
"question": "Is your hair dyed an unusual color?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Had red-dyed hair; inattentive",
"response_text": "In Jackson v. Crockett, a Black female juror was struck because "she appeared to be inattentive and because she had red-dyed hair." The trial judge accepted the juror's appearance as a valid race-neutral reason for exclusion.",
"case_name": "Jackson v. Crockett",
"case_citation": "No. 3:12cv124u2013DPJu2013FKB (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": "The prosecutor explained that Ms. Brown had been stricken because she appeared to be inattentive and because she had red-dyed hair."
}
]
},
{
"category": "Appearance",
"question": "Would you describe your hairstyle as unconventional?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Strange hair design; same unusual hairstyle as defendant",
"response_text": "In Knox v. Cain, a juror was struck because he had "a ponytail, a sort of strange hair design." The prosecutor said the juror's "age is very much in line with the age of the defendant" and he was "concerned that he may identify with him and both have unusual hairstyles."",
"case_name": "Knox v. Cain",
"case_citation": "No. 5:13-CV-241-KHJ (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": "One juror had 'a ponytail, a sort of strange hair design.' His 'age is very much in line with the age of the defendant,' and the prosecutor was 'concerned that he may identify with him and both have unusual hairstyles.'"
}
]
},
{
"category": "Relationships",
"question": "Do you personally know anyone who has been charged with a serious crime?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Knew someone charged with a similar crime",
"response_text": "In Vasser v. State, a juror was struck because they knew someone who had been charged with a similar crime 20 years earlier.",
"case_name": "Vasser v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2020-KA-00358-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Age",
"question": "Are you under 25 years old?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Under age 25",
"response_text": "In Johnson v. State, three Black jurors were struck because they were under age 25.",
"case_name": "Johnson v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2017-KA-01722-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Health",
"question": "Do you have any difficulty hearing?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Hard of hearing",
"response_text": "In Sims v. State, a Black juror was struck because she was "hard of hearing."",
"case_name": "Sims v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2014u2013KAu201301174u2013COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Health",
"question": "Do you have any chronic pain or physical condition that makes it hard to sit for long periods of time?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Had pain issues",
"response_text": "In the federal case United States v. Abreu & Young, a juror was struck because she had pain issues that could affect her ability to serve.",
"case_name": "United States v. Abreu & Young",
"case_citation": "No. 1:20-cr-48-HSO-RHWR (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Opinions",
"question": "How do you feel about the use of informant testimony in criminal cases?",
"answer_options": [
"Trustworthy",
"Depends on the case",
"Skeptical"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Skeptical",
"reason_given": "Had mixed feelings about informant testimony",
"response_text": "In Washington v. State, jurors were struck for having problems with or mixed opinions on informant or "snitch" testimony.",
"case_name": "Washington v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2021-KA-01384-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
},
{
"answer": "Depends on the case",
"reason_given": "Had mixed feelings about informant testimony",
"response_text": "In Washington v. State, jurors were struck for having problems with or mixed opinions on informant or "snitch" testimony.",
"case_name": "Washington v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2021-KA-01384-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Opinions",
"question": "Do you have strong feelings about the government's use of confidential informants?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Strong opinions about confidential informants",
"response_text": "In the federal case United States v. Abreu & Young, a juror was struck for having strong opinions about the government's use of paid confidential informants.",
"case_name": "United States v. Abreu & Young",
"case_citation": "No. 1:20-cr-48-HSO-RHWR (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Opinions",
"question": "In the early years of COVID (2020-2021), did you feel masking and social distancing requirements went too far?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Disapproval of COVID protocols",
"response_text": "In the federal case United States v. Abreu & Young, a juror was struck for expressing disapproval of COVID protocols in the courtroom.",
"case_name": "United States v. Abreu & Young",
"case_citation": "No. 1:20-cr-48-HSO-RHWR (S.D. Miss.)",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Criminal History",
"question": "Have you ever been arrested or convicted of a crime?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Criminal background of juror",
"response_text": "A juror's own criminal history has been cited in several cases, including Brown v. State, Eubanks v. State, and Jackson v. Crockett. The Mississippi Supreme Court lists criminal history as a valid race-neutral reason for a strike.",
"case_name": "Brown v. State; Eubanks v. State; Jackson v. Crockett; Wilson v. State",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
},
{
"category": "Jury Service",
"question": "Have you ever served on a criminal jury before?",
"answer_options": [
"Yes",
"No"
],
"eliminating_answers": [
{
"answer": "Yes",
"reason_given": "Previously served on a criminal jury",
"response_text": "In Marshall v. State and Wolfe v. State, having previously served on a criminal jury was cited as a reason to strike a juror. In Jackson v. Crockett, a juror's past voting record in criminal trials was also considered.",
"case_name": "Marshall v. State; Wolfe v. State; Jackson v. Crockett",
"case_citation": "",
"quote": ""
}
]
}
];
const RANDOM_EVENTS = [
{
"event_text": "The prosecutor pauses, looks at you for a long moment, and shakes his head.",
"reason_given": "Didn't like their 'vibe'",
"response_text": "In Dille v. State, the prosecutor struck a Black juror, saying, "Her demeanor was just one of irritation and not comfortable being here. So the State just didn't get a good vibe. I did not get a good vibe."",
"quote": "Her demeanor was just one of irritation and not comfortable being here. So the State just didn't get a good vibe. I did not get a good vibe.",
"case_name": "Dille v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2019-KA-00855-COA (Miss. Ct. App.)"
},
{
"event_text": "The prosecutor tells the judge your body language makes him uncomfortable.",
"reason_given": "Bad body language and demeanor",
"response_text": "In Jones v. State, a Black juror was struck because, according to the prosecutor, "he had his arms crossed looking at me shaking his head, no; and I just don't feel comfortable allowing a juror with that kind of body language to serve on one of my juries." The Mississippi Supreme Court lists body language and demeanor as valid race-neutral reasons.",
"quote": "His body language and the way he communicated, his personality, he had his arms crossed looking at me shaking his head, no; and I just don't feel comfortable allowing a juror with that kind of body language to serve on one of my juries.",
"case_name": "Jones v. State; Allen v. State; Garlington v. State",
"case_citation": ""
},
{
"event_text": "The prosecutor confers with a law enforcement officer seated behind him, who shakes his head while looking at you. The prosecutor strikes you from the jury.",
"reason_given": "Law enforcement advised against juror",
"response_text": "In Payne v. State, the prosecutor said, "I was told by law enforcement [that she] was not a good person to be on the jury." In Mootye v. State, a juror sparked "concern from law enforcement officers." In several cases, strikes were based on information prosecutors received from police rather than from the jurors themselves.",
"quote": "I was told by law enforcement [that she] was not a good person to be on the jury that knew her from the drug agents[...] she would not be a good juror.",
"case_name": "Payne v. State; Mootye v. State; Pettus v. State",
"case_citation": ""
},
{
"event_text": "The prosecutor glances at your juror card, then tells the judge he recognizes your last name.",
"reason_given": "Same last name as people prosecuted by the DA",
"response_text": "In Jones v. State, the prosecutor struck two Black jurors because their last names matched those of people his office had prosecuted, calling them "known bootleggers." The defense pointed out the names were common, "just like the Joneses." In Payne v. State, a juror was struck because the prosecutor had "several people" with her last name on the criminal docket. In both cases, the court accepted the strikes as race-neutral.",
"quote": "According to law enforcement, we have prosecuted many McKinneys, known to be bootleggers; and we asked the question. They didn't respond.",
"case_name": "Jones v. State; Payne v. State; Clark v. State; Pettus v. State",
"case_citation": ""
},
{
"event_text": "The prosecutor reads out a list of witnesses. He notices you react to one of the names and strikes you from the jury.",
"reason_given": "Knew defense witnesses",
"response_text": "In Flowers v. State, jurors were struck for knowing several defense witnesses. One juror had worked with the defendant's father at Walmart and had been sued by a business connected to the case.",
"quote": "",
"case_name": "Flowers v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2010-DP-01348-SCT (Miss. 2017)"
},
{
"event_text": "The prosecutor reads your juror card, looks at the defendant, then back at you. He tells the judge you went to the same school as the defendant.",
"reason_given": "Went to the same school as the defendant",
"response_text": "In Clark v. State, two Black jurors were struck in part for having gone to the same middle school as the defendant.",
"quote": "",
"case_name": "Clark v. State",
"case_citation": "No. 2019-DP-00689-SCT (Miss. 2022)"
}
];
/**
* Builds and sets share links for a result screen.
*
* @param {string} outcome - 'struck' or 'seated'
* @param {number} answered - number of questions the player answered
* @param {string} fbId - element ID of the Facebook share anchor
* @param {string} bskyId - element ID of the Bluesky share anchor
*/
function buildShareLinks(outcome, answered, fbId, bskyId) {
const verb = outcome === 'struck' ? 'struck from' : 'seated on';
const pageUrl = window.location.href.split('?')[0].split('#')[0];
const text = `I answered ${answered} question${answered === 1 ? '' : 's'} and was ${verb} the jury. Would you survive jury selection in Mississippi?`;
function renderSurvived() {
dom.progress.hidden = true;
dom.survivedContext.textContent = `You answered ${state.round.length} questions and none of your responses matched a reason that Mississippi prosecutors have used to strike a potential juror.`;
The justices took up an appeal from Terry Pitchford in a case with similarities to that of another Black man on Mississippi’s death row, whose conviction the high court overturned seven years ago.
The jury that sentenced Pitchford to death for his role in the killing of a grocery store owner in northern Mississippi had one Black juror. Doug Evans, a now-retired prosecutor with a history of dismissing Black jurors for discriminatory reasons, had excused four other Black people.
The Supreme Court ruled 40 years ago in Batson v. Kentucky that jurors could not be excused from service because of their race and set up a system by which trial judges could evaluate claims of discrimination and the race-neutral explanations by prosecutors.
Pitchford’s case focuses on whether his lawyers did enough to object to Judge Joseph Loper’s rulings and whether the state Supreme Court acted reasonably in ruling they had not.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh said he thought one of Pitchford’s lawyers had spoken up. Reading from the trial transcript, Kavanaugh said, “She’s trying to make the objections right there.”
There was broad agreement that neither the judge nor the lawyers performed especially well when the jury was chosen.
“This is the most timid and reticent defense counsel that I have ever encountered,” Justice Samuel Alito said.
But Alito also faulted Loper, who accepted Evans’ explanations and moved on without analyzing whether race was the reason.
“The judge didn’t handle this the way it should have been handled,” Alito said.
In 2019 in another Misissippi case, the Supreme Court overturned the death sentence and conviction of Curtis Flowers, because of what Kavanaugh described as a “relentless, determined effort to rid the jury of Black individuals.”
Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart sought to distinguish Pitchford’s case from Flowers’.
“In Flowers versus Mississippi, this Court faced an extraordinary case and ruled against the state,” Stewart said. “This case is also extraordinary but in a very different way that requires a very different result.”
The Supreme Court could rule for Pitchford but still leave it to lower courts to sort out whether his conviction should be overturned.
Pitchford, now 40, was 18 when he and a friend decided to rob the Crossroads Grocery, just outside Grenada in northern Mississippi. The friend shot store owner Reuben Britt three times, fatally wounding him, but was ineligible for the death penalty because he was younger than 18. Pitchford was tried for capital murder and sentenced to death.
The case has been making its way through the court system for 20 years. In 2023, U.S District Judge Michael P. Mills overturned Pitchford’s conviction, holding that the trial judge did not give Pitchford’s lawyers enough of a chance to argue that the prosecution was improperly dismissing Black jurors.
Mills wrote that his ruling was partially motivated by Evans’ actions in prior cases. A unanimous panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling.
Kavanaugh, in an exchange with Stewart, praised Mills’ handling of the case.
“Mills is a very experienced district judge. He had been a former Mississippi Supreme Court justice. He knows what he’s doing,” Kavanaugh said. “He read the record entirely differently than you did.”